为什么“继续"在 Foreach 对象中表现得像“中断"? [英] Why does 'continue' behave like 'break' in a Foreach-Object?
问题描述
如果我在 PowerShell 脚本中执行以下操作:
If I do the following in a PowerShell script:
$range = 1..100
ForEach ($_ in $range) {
if ($_ % 7 -ne 0 ) { continue; }
Write-Host "$($_) is a multiple of 7"
}
我得到了预期的输出:
7 is a multiple of 7
14 is a multiple of 7
21 is a multiple of 7
28 is a multiple of 7
35 is a multiple of 7
42 is a multiple of 7
49 is a multiple of 7
56 is a multiple of 7
63 is a multiple of 7
70 is a multiple of 7
77 is a multiple of 7
84 is a multiple of 7
91 is a multiple of 7
98 is a multiple of 7
但是,如果我使用管道和 ForEach-Object
,continue
似乎会跳出管道循环.
However, if I use a pipeline and ForEach-Object
, continue
seems to break out of the pipeline loop.
1..100 | ForEach-Object {
if ($_ % 7 -ne 0 ) { continue; }
Write-Host "$($_) is a multiple of 7"
}
我能否在执行 ForEach-Object 的同时获得类似 continue
的行为,这样我就不必中断我的管道?
Can I get a continue
-like behavior while still doing ForEach-Object, so I don't have to breakup my pipeline?
推荐答案
只需使用 return
而不是 continue
.这个 return
从脚本块返回,该脚本块由 ForEach-Object
在特定迭代中调用,因此,它模拟了循环中的 continue
.
Simply use the return
instead of the continue
. This return
returns from the script block which is invoked by ForEach-Object
on a particular iteration, thus, it simulates the continue
in a loop.
1..100 | ForEach-Object {
if ($_ % 7 -ne 0 ) { return }
Write-Host "$($_) is a multiple of 7"
}
重构时需要牢记一个问题.有时人们想将 foreach
语句块转换为带有 ForEach-Object
cmdlet 的管道(它甚至有别名 foreach
有助于使这种转换很容易,也很容易出错).所有 continue
应该替换为 return
.
There is a gotcha to be kept in mind when refactoring. Sometimes one wants to convert a foreach
statement block into a pipeline with a ForEach-Object
cmdlet (it even has the alias foreach
that helps to make this conversion easy and make mistakes easy, too). All continue
s should be replaced with return
.
P.S.:不幸的是,在 ForEach-Object
中模拟 break
并不是那么容易.
P.S.: Unfortunately, it is not that easy to simulate break
in ForEach-Object
.
这篇关于为什么“继续"在 Foreach 对象中表现得像“中断"?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!