如何在检测习语中要求精确的函数签名? [英] How to require an exact function signature in the detection idiom?

问题描述

假设我有一个 T 类型，我想检测它是否有一个下标运算符，我可以用另一个类型 Index 调用它.以下示例工作正常:

Let's suppose I have a type T and I want to detect whether it has a subscript operator which I can call with with another type Index. The following example works just fine:

#include <type_traits>
#include <vector>

template < typename T, typename Index >
using subscript_t = decltype(std::declval<T>()[std::declval<Index>()]);

int main()
{
    using a = subscript_t< std::vector<int>, size_t >;
    using b = subscript_t< std::vector<int>, int    >;
}

但是，我希望当且仅当函数签名完全匹配时才能检测到该函数.在上面的例子中，我想要语句 subscript_t<std::vector<int>, int >; 抛出类似no可靠重载运算符[]的错误，因为std::vector的下标运算符的签名 是

However, I want the function to be detected if and only if the function signature matches exactly. In the example above I would like the statement subscript_t< std::vector<int>, int >; to throw an error like no viable overloaded operator[], because the signature of the subscript operator for std::vector is

std::vector<T, std::allocator<T>>::operator[](size_type pos);

其中 size_type 在 GCC 中是 unsigned long.如何避免从 int 到 size_t 的隐式转换发生?

where size_type in GCC is unsigned long. How can I avoid the implicit conversion from int to size_t to take place?

推荐答案

With is_detected，你可以这样做:

With is_detected, you may do:

template <typename T, typename Ret, typename Index>
using subscript_t = std::integral_constant<Ret (T::*) (Index), & T::operator[]>;


template <typename T, typename Ret, typename Index>
using has_subscript = is_detected<subscript_t, T, Ret, Index>;

static_assert(has_subscript<std::vector<int>, int&, std::size_t>::value, "!");
static_assert(!has_subscript<std::vector<int>, int&, int>::value, "!");

演示

我在 SO 文档中写了这个:

I wrote this in SO Documentation:

概括type_trait的创建:基于SFINAE有实验特征detected_or、detected_t、is_detected.

To generalize type_trait creation:based on SFINAE there are experimental traits detected_or, detected_t, is_detected.

带模板参数typename Default，template Op 和 typename ... Args:

• is_detected:std::true_type 或 std::false_type 的别名，取决于 Op
• detected_t:Op 或 nonesuch 的别名，取决于 Op.
• detected_or:value_t 是 is_detected 和 type 是 的结构的别名Op 或 Default 取决于 Op
的有效性

• is_detected: alias of std::true_type or std::false_type depending of the validity of Op<Args...>
• detected_t: alias of Op<Args...> or nonesuch depending of validity of Op<Args...>.
• detected_or: alias of a struct with value_t which is is_detected, and type which is Op<Args...> or Default depending of validity of Op<Args...>

可以使用 std::void_t 为 SFINAE 实现如下:

which can be implemented using std::void_t for SFINAE as following:

namespace detail {
    template <class Default, class AlwaysVoid,
              template<class...> class Op, class... Args>
    struct detector
    {
        using value_t = std::false_type;
        using type = Default;
    };

    template <class Default, template<class...> class Op, class... Args>
    struct detector<Default, std::void_t<Op<Args...>>, Op, Args...>
    {
        using value_t = std::true_type;
        using type = Op<Args...>;
    };

} // namespace detail

// special type to indicate detection failure
struct nonesuch {
    nonesuch() = delete;
    ~nonesuch() = delete;
    nonesuch(nonesuch const&) = delete;
    void operator=(nonesuch const&) = delete;
};

template <template<class...> class Op, class... Args>
using is_detected =
    typename detail::detector<nonesuch, void, Op, Args...>::value_t;

template <template<class...> class Op, class... Args>
using detected_t = typename detail::detector<nonesuch, void, Op, Args...>::type;

template <class Default, template<class...> class Op, class... Args>
using detected_or = detail::detector<Default, void, Op, Args...>;

然后可以简单地实现检测方法存在的特征:

Traits to detect presence of method can then be simply implemented:

template <typename T, typename ...Ts>
using foo_type = decltype(std::declval<T>().foo(std::declval<Ts>()...));

struct C1 {};

struct C2 {
    int foo(char) const;
};

template <typename T>
using has_foo_char = is_detected<foo_type, T, char>;

static_assert(!has_foo_char<C1>::value, "Unexpected");
static_assert(has_foo_char<C2>::value, "Unexpected");

static_assert(std::is_same<int, detected_t<foo_type, C2, char>>::value,
              "Unexpected");

static_assert(std::is_same<void, // Default
                           detected_or<void, foo_type, C1, char>>::value,
              "Unexpected");
static_assert(std::is_same<int, detected_or<void, foo_type, C2, char>>::value,
              "Unexpected");

这篇关于如何在检测习语中要求精确的函数签名?的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！