使用 Rails、backbone.js 和 accepts_nested_attributes_for 保存嵌套对象 [英] Saving nested objects with Rails, backbone.js, and accepts_nested_attributes_for
问题描述
我正在使用 Rails、backbone.js(现在正在学习).假设您有两个模型,汽车和引擎.
I'm using Rails, backbone.js (learning this now). Let's say you have two models, Car and Engine.
var Car = Backbone.Model.extend({
initialize: function() {
if(this.get('engine') != undefined) this.engine = new Engine(this.get('engine'));
}
}
var redCar = new Car({
'color': 'red',
// The controller nests the model
'engine': {
'horsepower': '350'
}
});
redCar.save()
将 engine_attributes
发送到控制器的正确方法是什么?(汽车 accepts_nested_attributes_for :engine
,所以它需要 engine_attributes
.)我是否覆盖 Backbone sync()
?对于嵌套模型,是否有更好的约定可遵循?
What is the right way to send engine_attributes
to the controller? (Car accepts_nested_attributes_for :engine
, so it expects engine_attributes
.) Do I override the Backbone sync()
? Is there a better convention to follow for nested models?
也许我不应该从控制器返回嵌套模型,或者返回 engine_attributes
而不是 engine
?
Maybe I should not be returning nested models from the controller, or returning engine_attributes
instead of engine
?
顺便说一句,我正在使用 Rails respond_with(@car, :include => :engine)
(与 @car.to_json(:include => 相同:引擎)
.事实上,这个 api 将引擎属性嵌套在 engine
下,但模型期望 engine_attributes
似乎是矛盾的 - 我从来不知道如何协调这个.
On a side note, I am using the Rails respond_with(@car, :include => :engine)
(same as @car.to_json(:include => :engine)
. The fact that this api nests the engine attributes under engine
but the model expects engine_attributes
seems contradictory - I've never been sure how to reconcile this.
推荐答案
我建议在主干模型上覆盖 toJSON.
I would suggest to override toJSON on the backbone model.
toJSON: function(){
json = {car : this.attributes};
return _.extend(json, {engine_attributes: this.get("engine").toJSON());
}
toJSON 在将数据发送到后端之前在同步方法中调用.
toJSON is called within the sync method just before sending data to the backend.
这篇关于使用 Rails、backbone.js 和 accepts_nested_attributes_for 保存嵌套对象的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!