为什么在 Promise.all() 之后不调用 onRejected,其中 Promise.reject() 包含在传递给 Promise.all() 的数组中? [英] Why is onRejected not called following Promise.all() where Promise.reject() included in array passed to Promise.all()?
问题描述
给定
var promises = [Promise.resolve("a"), Promise.reject("b")];
Promise.all(promises.map(function(p, index) {
return p.then(function(data) {
console.log("inside .map()", data, "index", index)
return data
}, function(err) {
console.log(err);
return err
})
}))
.then(function(complete) {
console.log("all promises after .map()", complete)
}, function(err) {
console.log("err", err)
})
为什么在 .then(onFulfilled, onRejected)
后面的 Promise.all()
中没有调用 onRejected
?
why is onRejected
not called at .then(onFulfilled, onRejected)
following Promise.all()
?
jsfiddle https://jsfiddle.net/9gprLc7q/
https://jsfiddle.net/9gprLc7q/
推荐答案
你在这里真正完成的事情是这样的:
What you've really done here is something like this:
https://jsfiddle.net/9gprLc7q/5/
var notRejectedPromise =
Promise.reject("b")
.then((resolved) => resolved, (err) => err)
var promises = [Promise.resolve("a"), notRejectedPromise];
Promise.all(promises)
.then(function(complete) {
console.log("all promises after .map()", complete)
}, function(err) {
console.log("err", err)
})
但是决定通过返回任何 err
来处理 err 部分,您返回了一个字符串.这不是拒绝的理由.
But deciding to handle the err portion by returning whatever err
was, you returned a string. This is not a reason for rejection.
要实际导致 Promise.all()
拒绝,您需要在 resolved
或 rejected
部分发生错误代码>.then
To actually cause the Promise.all()
to reject you need an error to occur in either the resolved
or rejected
portion of .then
鉴于此,如果您返回一个被拒绝的承诺,它将被拒绝:
Given this, if you return a rejected promise, it will reject:
https://jsfiddle.net/9gprLc7q/3/
console.log(err)
到
return Promise.reject(err)
或者你可以抛出一个错误:https://jsfiddle.net/9gprLc7q/2/
Alternatively you can throw an error: https://jsfiddle.net/9gprLc7q/2/
console.log(err)
到
throw new Error(err)
这篇关于为什么在 Promise.all() 之后不调用 onRejected,其中 Promise.reject() 包含在传递给 Promise.all() 的数组中?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!