{% load staticfiles %} 和 {% load static %} 有什么区别 [英] What is the difference between {% load staticfiles %} and {% load static %}

问题描述

问题最重要的部分是主题.

The most important part of the question is in the topic.

我想知道哪种标签最适合哪种情况.此外......我找到了代码，它也使用了 {{STATIC_URL}} 包含在模板中的 settings.STATIC_URL .

I am wondering what tag is best for which case. Moreover... I found code, that also use settings.STATIC_URL included by {{STATIC_URL}} in the templates.

我有点困惑.

推荐答案

内置static 模板标签链接[s]到STATIC_ROOT中保存的静态文件".

The built-in static template tag "link[s] to static files that are saved in STATIC_ROOT".

staticfiles contrib 应用程序的 static 模板标签使用配置的 STATICFILES_STORAGE 存储为给定的相对路径创建完整的 URL"，这在使用非本地存储后端部署文件时特别有用".

The staticfiles contrib app's static template tag "uses the configured STATICFILES_STORAGE storage to create the full URL for the given relative path", which is "especially useful when using a non-local storage backend to deploy files".

内置 static 模板标签的文档(链接到上面)有一个注释说使用 staticfiles contrib 应用程序的 static 模板标记如果您有高级用例，例如使用云服务来提供静态文件"，并给出了这样做的示例:

The built-in static template tag's documentation (linked to above) has a note that says to use the staticfiles contrib app's static template tag "if you have an advanced use case such as using a cloud service to serve static files", and it gives this example of doing so:

{% load static from staticfiles %}
<img src="{% static "images/hi.jpg" %}" alt="Hi!" />

如果需要，您可以使用 {% load staticfiles %} 而不是 {% load static from staticfiles %}，但后者更明确.

You could use {% load staticfiles %} rather than {% load static from staticfiles %} if you want, but the latter is more explicit.

这篇关于{% load staticfiles %} 和 {% load static %} 有什么区别的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！