F#在哪些领域“绝对没有使用意义"? [英] In what areas does F# make "absolute no sense in using"?

问题描述

Don Syme 在他的 SPLASH 演讲中说 F# 并不打算替代 C#，即使它具有通用功能.他接着说，有些领域使用 F# 没有意义，但没有在论文中展开.

Don Syme in his SPLASH talk says that F# is NOT intended to be a replacement for C# even though it has the general capabilities. He goes on to say that there are areas where F# makes no sense in using, but doesn't expand on the thesis.

1. 谁能告诉我在使用 F# 时应该避免哪些区域?
2. 您还可以提及 C# 的亮点.

相关问题:

在哪些领域使用 F# 可能比 C# 更合适吗?

推荐答案

我的看法是，更换像 C# 这样丰富和成熟的语言将非常昂贵.因此，例如，目前，如果使用 Visual Studio WinForms 设计器可以给您带来优势，那么 C# 绝对是 WinForms 开发的最佳选择:F# 没有 WinForms 设计器.

My take is that replacing a language as rich and mature as C# would be very expensive. So, for example, at the moment, C# is absolutely the best choice for WinForms development if using the Visual Studio WinForms designer can give you an advantage: F# has no WinForms designer.

C# 目前也有更好的 LINQ-to-SQL 支持.我相信还有很多其他的例子.

C# also has better LINQ-to-SQL support at the moment. I'm sure there are many other examples along these lines.

然后需要整个 C# 熟练劳动力将他们的技能更新为 F#，同时保留用于维护应用程序的 C# 技能，同样是昂贵的.

Then there is requiring the entire C# skilled workforce to update their skills to F#, while preserving C# skills for maintaining applications, again expensive.

最后，C# 是一种优秀的语言，具有许多强大的功能，一些 F# 甚至没有像 co/contra 变体泛型和针对 DLR 的动态编程的开箱即用支持(F# 只是有一个未实现的运算符).

Finally, C# is an excellent language with a lot of great features, some F# doesn't even have like co/contra variant generics and out of the box support for dynamic programming against the DLR (F# just has an unimplemented operator).

因此，通过不期望 F# 取代 C#，F# 可以以新的方式发展，而不是把所有时间都花在已经很好覆盖的领域追赶上.

So by not expecting F# to replace C#, F# can evolve in new ways instead of spending all it's time playing catch-up in areas already well-covered.

这篇关于F#在哪些领域“绝对没有使用意义"?的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！