std::vector 是否使用 push_back 复制对象? [英] Is std::vector copying the objects with a push_back?

查看:55
本文介绍了std::vector 是否使用 push_back 复制对象?的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

在对 valgrind 进行大量调查后,我得出的结论是 std::vector 制作了一个您想要 push_back 的对象的副本.

After a lot of investigations with valgrind, I've made the conclusion that std::vector makes a copy of an object you want to push_back.

真的是这样吗?一个向量不能在没有副本的情况下保留对象的引用或指针?!

Is that really true ? A vector cannot keep a reference or a pointer of an object without a copy ?!

谢谢

推荐答案

是的,std::vector::push_back() 创建参数的副本并将其存储在向量中.如果您想在向量中存储指向对象的指针,请创建一个 std::vector 而不是 std::vector.

Yes, std::vector<T>::push_back() creates a copy of the argument and stores it in the vector. If you want to store pointers to objects in your vector, create a std::vector<whatever*> instead of std::vector<whatever>.

但是,您需要确保指针引用的对象在向量持有对它们的引用时保持有效(使用 RAII 惯用语的智能指针解决了问题).

However, you need to make sure that the objects referenced by the pointers remain valid while the vector holds a reference to them (smart pointers utilizing the RAII idiom solve the problem).

这篇关于std::vector 是否使用 push_back 复制对象?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆