Moq 和 Rhino.mocks 的功能是什么? [英] What are the capabilities of Moq and Rhino.mocks?

问题描述

我找不到 Moq 和 Rhino 的具体功能比较.所有的问题都是你更喜欢哪个以及为什么"，或者这是你如何在 rhino 中做一个简单的模拟以及它是如何在 moq 中完成的".

I cannot find a specific feature-by-feature comparison of Moq and Rhino. All the questions are "which do you like better and why", or "here's how you do a simple mock in rhino and how it's done in moq".

我在任何地方都找不到深度比较.我知道语法差异，我不是在寻找答案.我正在寻找能力比较.例如:

I cannot find a deep comparison anywhere. I'm aware of the syntax differences, I'm not looking for answers about that. I am looking for a capability comparison. For example:

• Rhino 有 Expect.On() 用于线程嘲笑.起订量可以吗?

• Rhino has Expect.On() for threaded mocking. Can Moq do this?

Multi-mocking 怎么样(实现多个接口一个模拟).起订量可以吗?

What about Multi-mocking (implementing multiple interfaces with one mock). Can Moq do this?

我相信 Moq 现在可以模拟受保护的成员.Rhino 能做到吗?

I believe Moq can now mock Protected members. Can Rhino do this?

编辑:我最终还研究了其他一些 .Net 框架.

Edit: I ended up looking at some of the other .Net frameworks as well.

推荐答案

感谢过去几周做出回应的人.我最终写了一篇关于我的发现的博客文章，因为我不得不做这么多的挖掘工作，似乎我不妨总结一下，希望能帮助别人.我发布的图表整理了我的发现:

Thanks to those that responded over the last few weeks. I ended up writing a blog post about my findings, since I had to do so much digging that it seemed like I might as well summarize them in the hopes of helping others. The chart I posted organizes my findings:

我在博文中提到的一个警告是，图表对于检查功能很有用，但大多数框架的真正优势在于它们的独特功能.我最终选择了 Moq，因为 API 易于使用.此外，所有信息都可能出现错误和更改 - 如果您不同意图表中的某些内容，请发表评论.

One caveat, which I touched on in the blog post, is that the chart is useful for checking the capabilities, but the real advantages to most frameworks are their unique features. I chose Moq in the end because of the easy to use API. Also, all the information is subject to errors and change - if you disagree with something on the chart, please post a comment.

这篇关于Moq 和 Rhino.mocks 的功能是什么?的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！