自动版式:带比例元素与3.5英寸间距布局的一致性;和4英寸屏幕 [英] AutoLayout: layout consistency with proportional element spacing with 3.5" and 4" screens

查看:132
本文介绍了自动版式:带比例元素与3.5英寸间距布局的一致性;和4英寸屏幕的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

我想使用自动版式与他们之间的比例垂直间距(避免重茬3.5的屏幕,避免4底部的空白空间屏幕)位置控制。

在其他的答案的建议,我可以使用带有高度相等的束缚,改变乘数在必要间隔的意见。然而,最终的布局是不是像素完美的,所以发动机不能始终如一他们的位置。

症状:


  1. 当我一个更新所有帧,在IB,它不修复错位的意见,而只是与其他组的错位意见替换它们。


  2. 更​​重要的是,在运行时,我可以看到控制瞬间跳了几个像素向上或向下,每当我进入查看。


怎么我每次都达到同样一致的布局?


解决方案

  1. 的控件要在屏幕上垂直放置设置身高限制

  2. 的高度限制创建店铺。

  3. 对于3.5英寸和4英寸的屏幕,改变高度限制保持不变。
  4. 价值
  5. 如果更改高度不能解决宗旨,打造垂直空间的限制,并相应地设置自己的值。

I want to use AutoLayout to position controls with proportional vertical spacing between them (avoid cropping on a 3.5" screen, avoid blank bottom space on a 4" screen).

As suggested in other answers, I can use spacer views with "Equal Height" constraints, changing multiplier where necessary. However, the final layout is not pixel-perfect, so the engine can't position them consistently.

The symptoms:

  1. When I do an "Update All Frames" in IB, it doesn't fix misplaced views, but merely replaces them with other set of misplaced views.

  2. More importantly, at run time, I can see the controls momentarily jump a few pixels up or down, whenever I enter the view.

How to I achieve the same consistent layout every time?

解决方案

  1. Set Height constraints for the the controls which you want to place on the screen vertically
  2. Create outlets for the height constraints.
  3. For 3.5 inch and 4 inch screen, change the value of height constraints' constant.
  4. If changing the height doesn't solve the purpose, create Vertical Space Constraints and set their values accordingly.

这篇关于自动版式:带比例元素与3.5英寸间距布局的一致性;和4英寸屏幕的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆