EF4.1使用Microsoft.ApplicationServer.Caching.DataCacheFactory挂起时120秒 [英] EF4.1 hangs for 120 seconds when using Microsoft.ApplicationServer.Caching.DataCacheFactory

查看:286
本文介绍了EF4.1使用Microsoft.ApplicationServer.Caching.DataCacheFactory挂起时120秒的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

我有一个一致的,可重复的120秒挂每当应​​用程序调用

I have a consistent, repeatable 120 second hang whenever the application calls

 this.cacheProvider.Add(new CacheItem(cacheKey, data, this.regionName), cachePolicy);

在样本。的 CachedDataSource.cs线60。在。新增方法是内部微软的DLL和我没有code到它。这里是我的参数:

at line 60 of the CachedDataSource.cs of the sample.. The .Add method is internal to Microsoft's DLL and I don't have code to it. Here are my parameters:

cacheKey = "listofCompanies"
data = // this is an EF 4.0 database first model class with 70 entries... result from IQueryable
this.regionName = "companies"

重现错误:

我有我最近通过添加的EntityFramework引用和的 ContextGenerator我DAL

I have a database-first EF4.0 project that I recently upgraded to 4.1 by adding the "EntityFramework" reference and a ContextGenerator to my DAL.

如果我取消这些变化,然后我的应用程序是当下高性能的。

If I undo these changes, then my application is instantly performant.

我的DAL和资源库存储在一个单独的DLL从我的MVC应用程序。不知道这是打的问题的一部分。

My DAL and repository are stored in a separate DLL from my MVC application. Not sure if this is playing a part of the issue.

关于我的仓库

    /// Sample repository.  Note that I return List<T> as IEnumerable, 
    /// and I use IDisposable 
    ///
    public class CompanyRepository : DisposableBase, ICompanyRepository
    {
        public IEnumerable<CompanyDetail> GetOneCompany(int? CompanyID)
        {
            var t = from c in _entities.CompanyDetail
                    where c.CompanyID == CompanyID.Value
                    select c;
            return t.ToList();
        }
    }

    /// <summary>
    /// Disposable implementation based on advice from this link:
    /// from Http://www.asp.net/entity-framework/tutorials/implementing-the-repository-and-unit-of-work-patterns-in-an-asp-net-mvc-application
    /// </summary>
    public class DisposableBase : IDisposable
    {
        protected TLSAdminEntities1 _entities;

        public DisposableBase()
        {
            _entities = new TLSAdminEntities1();
            disposed = false;
        }

        private bool disposed ;
        protected virtual void Dispose(bool disposing)
        {
            if (!this.disposed)
            {
                if (disposing)
                {
                    _entities.Dispose();
                }
            }
            this.disposed = true;
        }
        public void Dispose()
        {
            Dispose(true);
            GC.SuppressFinalize(this);
        }
    }

这是一个bug,还是我使用EF4.1,或缓存层不正确?

Is this a bug, or am I using EF4.1, or the Caching layer incorrectly?

推荐答案

您提到的数据是IQueryable的结果。您是否尝试过在数据传送过它的缓存前先执行.ToList()?

You mention that data is the result of IQueryable. Have you tried to perform .ToList() first on the data before sending it over to cache?

这篇关于EF4.1使用Microsoft.ApplicationServer.Caching.DataCacheFactory挂起时120秒的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆