Azure的移动参与VS移动业务 [英] Azure Mobile engagement vs Mobile services

查看:237
本文介绍了Azure的移动参与VS移动业务的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

似乎有很多由这两种服务的提供的功能之间的重叠:
上下文感知的智能推送通知
在应用程序的消息在所有连接的设备。

It seems there is lot of overlap between features provided by both of these services: contextually-aware smart push notifications in-app messaging across all connected devices.

难道我们preFER手机参与了移动33.060.99?

Should we prefer Mobile Engagement over Mobile Servies?

推荐答案

这取决于你想要什么功能。另外,不要忘了Azure的移动应用 - 扩展到具有相同的移动属性的Azure移动服务Azure的Web应用程序(Azure的应用程序服务),但与应用服务优势

It depends on what features you want. Also, don't forget Azure Mobile Apps - an extension to Azure Web Apps (Azure App Service) that has the same mobile properties as Azure Mobile Services, but with App Service advantages.

如果您的需求更符合企业级应用 - 你需要导通$ P $点或云服务的SQL,离线同步,企业认证,连续部署,A / B测试,相关的网站的数据访问的使用相同的后端 - 那么Azure的移动应用(Web应用程序)是正确的选择。

If your needs are more in-line with enterprise usage - you need data access to on-prem or cloud SQL services, offline sync, enterprise authentication, continuous deployment, A/B testing, an associated web site that uses the same backend - then Azure Mobile Apps (Web Apps) is the right choice.

如果您需要更多的消费/品牌空间 - 参与分析和应用程序内的消息,那么Azure的移动参与是正确的选择。

If your needs are more in the consumer / brand space - engagement analytics and in-app messaging, then Azure Mobile Engagement is the right choice.

两者都应用使用统计和推送通知。

Both have application usage statistics and push notifications.

一个不preclude对方。你可以,例如,写的Azure移动应用的移动后端和相关的网站,然后在更丰富的互动分析带来了移动参与到你的应用程序。

One does not preclude the other. You could, for example, write the mobile backend and associated web site in Azure Mobile Apps and then bring in the rich engagement analytics that Mobile Engagement to your apps.

这篇关于Azure的移动参与VS移动业务的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆