使用shell时忽略subprocess.call（）参数= TRUE W /名单 [英] subprocess.call() arguments ignored when using shell=True w/ list

问题描述

我试图让Python的subprocess.call方法来接受一些ARGS通过列表（包括字符串序列）的命令，蟒蛇文档中的建议。为了探讨这一行为把它变成我的实际脚本之前，我打开了IPython的，跑到涉及shell设置和args命令的不同组合一些命令，得到了以下行为：

I am trying to get python's subprocess.call method to accept some args commands through a list (consisting of a sequence of strings) as advised in the python documentation. To explore this behavior before putting it into my actual script, I opened up IPython, ran some commands involving different combinations of shell settings and args commands and got the following behavior:

In [3]: subprocess.call(['ls', '-%sl' %'a'])
total 320
drwxr-xr-x  20 Kohaugustine  staff   680 Oct 15 16:55 .
drwxr-xr-x   5 Kohaugustine  staff   170 Sep 12 17:16 ..
-rwxr-xr-x   1 Kohaugustine  staff  8544 Oct 15 16:55 a.out
-rwxr-xr-x   1 Kohaugustine  staff  8544 Oct  3 10:28 ex1-6
-rw-r--r--@  1 Kohaugustine  staff   204 Oct  3 10:28 ex1-6.c
-rwxr-xr-x   1 Kohaugustine  staff  8496 Oct  3 10:15 ex1-7
-rw-r--r--@  1 Kohaugustine  staff    71 Oct  3 10:15 ex1-7.c
-rwxr-xr-x   1 Kohaugustine  staff  8496 Sep 12 16:22 hello
-rw-r--r--@  1 Kohaugustine  staff    58 Sep 12 16:27 hello.c
-rwxr-xr-x   1 Kohaugustine  staff  8496 Sep 12 16:24 hello.o
-rwxr-xr-x   1 Kohaugustine  staff  8496 Sep 12 16:24 hello_1.o
-rwxr-xr-x   1 Kohaugustine  staff  8496 Sep 12 16:27 hello_2.o
-rwxr-xr-x   1 Kohaugustine  staff  8496 Sep 12 16:27 hello_3.o
-rwxr-xr-x   1 Kohaugustine  staff  8544 Oct 15 16:55 lesson_1-5
-rw-r--r--@  1 Kohaugustine  staff   185 Sep 28 10:35 lesson_1-5.c
-rwxr-xr-x   1 Kohaugustine  staff  8496 Sep 21 10:06 temperature.o
-rw-r--r--@  1 Kohaugustine  staff   406 Sep 21 09:54 temperature_ex1-3.c
-rw-r--r--@  1 Kohaugustine  staff   582 Sep 21 10:06 temperature_ex1-4.c
-rw-r--r--@  1 Kohaugustine  staff   178 Sep 23 17:21 temperature_ex1-5.c
-rwxr-xr-x   1 Kohaugustine  staff  8496 Sep 23 17:21 temperature_ex1-5.o
Out[3]: 0

In [4]: subprocess.call(['ls', '-%sl' %'a'], shell=True)
a.out           ex1-7           hello.c         hello_2.o       lesson_1-5.c            temperature_ex1-4.c
ex1-6           ex1-7.c         hello.o         hello_3.o       temperature.o           temperature_ex1-5.c
ex1-6.c         hello           hello_1.o       lesson_1-5      temperature_ex1-3.c     temperature_ex1-5.o
Out[4]: 0

In [6]: subprocess.call(['ls', '-al'])    
total 320
drwxr-xr-x  20 Kohaugustine  staff   680 Oct 15 16:55 .
drwxr-xr-x   5 Kohaugustine  staff   170 Sep 12 17:16 ..
-rwxr-xr-x   1 Kohaugustine  staff  8544 Oct 15 16:55 a.out
-rwxr-xr-x   1 Kohaugustine  staff  8544 Oct  3 10:28 ex1-6
-rw-r--r--@  1 Kohaugustine  staff   204 Oct  3 10:28 ex1-6.c
-rwxr-xr-x   1 Kohaugustine  staff  8496 Oct  3 10:15 ex1-7
-rw-r--r--@  1 Kohaugustine  staff    71 Oct  3 10:15 ex1-7.c
-rwxr-xr-x   1 Kohaugustine  staff  8496 Sep 12 16:22 hello
-rw-r--r--@  1 Kohaugustine  staff    58 Sep 12 16:27 hello.c
-rwxr-xr-x   1 Kohaugustine  staff  8496 Sep 12 16:24 hello.o
-rwxr-xr-x   1 Kohaugustine  staff  8496 Sep 12 16:24 hello_1.o
-rwxr-xr-x   1 Kohaugustine  staff  8496 Sep 12 16:27 hello_2.o
-rwxr-xr-x   1 Kohaugustine  staff  8496 Sep 12 16:27 hello_3.o
-rwxr-xr-x   1 Kohaugustine  staff  8544 Oct 15 16:55 lesson_1-5
-rw-r--r--@  1 Kohaugustine  staff   185 Sep 28 10:35 lesson_1-5.c
-rwxr-xr-x   1 Kohaugustine  staff  8496 Sep 21 10:06 temperature.o
-rw-r--r--@  1 Kohaugustine  staff   406 Sep 21 09:54 temperature_ex1-3.c
-rw-r--r--@  1 Kohaugustine  staff   582 Sep 21 10:06 temperature_ex1-4.c
-rw-r--r--@  1 Kohaugustine  staff   178 Sep 23 17:21 temperature_ex1-5.c
-rwxr-xr-x   1 Kohaugustine  staff  8496 Sep 23 17:21 temperature_ex1-5.o
Out[6]: 0

In [7]: subprocess.call(['ls', '-al'], shell = True)
a.out           ex1-7           hello.c         hello_2.o       lesson_1-5.c            temperature_ex1-4.c
ex1-6           ex1-7.c         hello.o         hello_3.o       temperature.o           temperature_ex1-5.c
ex1-6.c         hello           hello_1.o       lesson_1-5      temperature_ex1-3.c     temperature_ex1-5.o
Out[7]: 0

好像每当壳= TRUE，则输出好像是一样的：

It seems like whenever shell=True, the output seems to be the same as:

In [9]: subprocess.call(['ls'])
a.out           ex1-7           hello.c         hello_2.o       lesson_1-5.c            temperature_ex1-4.c
ex1-6           ex1-7.c         hello.o         hello_3.o       temperature.o           temperature_ex1-5.c
ex1-6.c         hello           hello_1.o       lesson_1-5      temperature_ex1-3.c     temperature_ex1-5.o
Out[9]: 0

我疑惑;发生了什么事-a选项时，我设置的shell =真？没有外壳看过吗？我读过的文档，它说，当外壳= TRUE，这意味着我的指定的命令将通过shell执行，所以它应该意味着LS -a加入到外壳，并经外壳采取行动。那么，为什么在行为[4]和[7]？
另外，pydocs没有直接说明它（尽管它说什么，当我们设置的shell =假subpprocess不会做）;这是什么意思，当我们让壳=假？是一个新的进程在OS催生无需外壳实际控制呢？

I'm puzzled; what happened to the '-a' option when I set shell=True? Didn't the shell read it? I've read the Docs and that it says that when shell=True, it means that my specified command will be executed through the shell, so it should mean that ls -a was fed to the shell and acted upon by the shell. Then why the behavior in [4] and [7] ? Also the pydocs doesn't explain it directly (although it does say what subpprocess will NOT DO when we set shell=False); what does it mean when we let shell=False? Is a new process spawned in the OS without having the shell actually control it?

此外，如果它似乎真的很尴尬，我使用的格式字符串[3] [4]，其因为在我将使用subprocess.call我实际的剧本，我将不得不依赖这些格式字符串在适当的命令选项来代替。我不能硬code一些命令行选项。使用ARGS纯字符串是出了问题太因为在我的剧本将有那必须做的命令列表操作的方法。我不知道是否有可能是一个更好的方式去了解这个的，所以如果将真正帮助，如果任何人都可以提出不同的东西。

Also, in case it might seem really awkward that I'm using a format string in [3] and [4], its because in my actual script where I'll be using subprocess.call, I will have to rely on these format strings to substitute in the appropriate command options. I cannot hardcode some of the command line options. Using a pure string for args is out of the question too because in my script there will be a method that has to do list operations on the commands. I don't know if there might be a better way to go about this though, so if will really help if anyone can suggest something different.

非常感谢你！

推荐答案

在壳为True，第一个参数被追加到 [/ bin / sh的，-c] 。如果这样的说法是一个列表，在结果列表

When shell is True, the first argument is appended to ["/bin/sh", "-c"]. If that argument is a list, the resulting list is

["/bin/sh", "-c", "ls", "-al"]

也就是说，只有 LS ，而不是 LS -al 作为参数传递给 -c 选项。 -al 作为第一个参数外壳本身，而不是 LS 。

That is, only ls, not ls -al is used as the argument to the -c option. -al is used as the first argument the shell itself, not ls.

在使用壳= TRUE ，你通常只是想传递一个字符串，并让壳根据外壳的正常字拆分规则拆分它。

When using shell=True, you generally just want to pass a single string and let the shell split it according the shell's normal word-splitting rules.

# Produces ["/bin/sh", "-c", "ls -al"]
subprocess.call("ls -al", shell=True)

在您的情况下，它不会看到像你需要使用壳= TRUE 的。

In your case, it doesn't see like you need to use shell=True at all.

这篇关于使用shell时忽略subprocess.call（）参数= TRUE W /名单的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！