什么是你最喜欢的LINQ到没有内置对象运营商？ [英] What's your favorite LINQ to Objects operator which is not built-in?

问题描述

通过扩展方法，我们可以写得心应手LINQ运营商解决了这些问题，通用

With extension methods, we can write handy LINQ operators which solve generic problems.

我想听到哪些方法或者你缺少在 System.Linq的命名空间重载以及如何实现它们。

I want to hear which methods or overloads you are missing in the System.Linq namespace and how you implemented them.

干净优雅的实现，也许用现有的方法，是preferred。

Clean and elegant implementations, maybe using existing methods, are preferred.

推荐答案

另外两个知名SQL结构的C＃等价物

In and NotIn

C# equivalents of two other well-known SQL constructs

/// <summary>
/// Determines if the source value is contained in the list of possible values.
/// </summary>
/// <typeparam name="T">The type of the objects</typeparam>
/// <param name="value">The source value</param>
/// <param name="values">The list of possible values</param>
/// <returns>
///     <c>true</c> if the source value matches at least one of the possible values; otherwise, <c>false</c>.
/// </returns>
public static bool In<T>(this T value, params T[] values)
{
    if (values == null)
        return false;

    if (values.Contains<T>(value))
        return true;

    return false;
}

/// <summary>
/// Determines if the source value is contained in the list of possible values.
/// </summary>
/// <typeparam name="T">The type of the objects</typeparam>
/// <param name="value">The source value</param>
/// <param name="values">The list of possible values</param>
/// <returns>
///     <c>true</c> if the source value matches at least one of the possible values; otherwise, <c>false</c>.
/// </returns>
public static bool In<T>(this T value, IEnumerable<T> values)
{
    if (values == null)
        return false;

    if (values.Contains<T>(value))
        return true;

    return false;
}

/// <summary>
/// Determines if the source value is not contained in the list of possible values.
/// </summary>
/// <typeparam name="T">The type of the objects</typeparam>
/// <param name="value">The source value</param>
/// <param name="values">The list of possible values</param>
/// <returns>
///     <c>false</c> if the source value matches at least one of the possible values; otherwise, <c>true</c>.
/// </returns>
public static bool NotIn<T>(this T value, params T[] values)
{
    return In(value, values) == false;
}

/// <summary>
/// Determines if the source value is not contained in the list of possible values.
/// </summary>
/// <typeparam name="T">The type of the objects</typeparam>
/// <param name="value">The source value</param>
/// <param name="values">The list of possible values</param>
/// <returns>
///     <c>false</c> if the source value matches at least one of the possible values; otherwise, <c>true</c>.
/// </returns>
public static bool NotIn<T>(this T value, IEnumerable<T> values)
{
    return In(value, values) == false;
}

这篇关于什么是你最喜欢的LINQ到没有内置对象运营商？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！