Shmem vs tmpfs vs mmap [英] Shmem vs tmpfs vs mmap
问题描述
有人知道以下3个速度的比较:
Does someone know how well the following 3 compare in terms of speed:
-
共享内存
shared memory
tmpfs(/ dev / shm)
tmpfs (/dev/shm)
li>
mmap (/dev/shm)
谢谢!
推荐答案
tmpfs
这里。下面是从那篇文章复制的,特别解释了共享内存和 tmpfs
之间的关系。
Read about tmpfs
here. The following is copied from that article, explaining the relation between shared memory and tmpfs
in particular.
1) There is always a kernel internal mount which you will not see at
all. This is used for shared anonymous mappings and SYSV shared
memory.
This mount does not depend on CONFIG_TMPFS. If CONFIG_TMPFS is not
set the user visible part of tmpfs is not build, but the internal
mechanisms are always present.
2) glibc 2.2 and above expects tmpfs to be mounted at /dev/shm for
POSIX shared memory (shm_open, shm_unlink). Adding the following
line to /etc/fstab should take care of this:
tmpfs /dev/shm tmpfs defaults 0 0
Remember to create the directory that you intend to mount tmpfs on
if necessary (/dev/shm is automagically created if you use devfs).
This mount is _not_ needed for SYSV shared memory. The internal
mount is used for that. (In the 2.3 kernel versions it was
necessary to mount the predecessor of tmpfs (shm fs) to use SYSV
shared memory)
所以,当你实际使用POSIX共享内存(我以前使用过),然后 glibc
将创建一个文件 / dev / shm
,用于在应用程序之间共享数据。它返回的文件描述符将引用那个文件,你可以传递到 mmap
来告诉它把这个文件映射到内存,就像它可以做任何真正的文件。因此,您列出的技术是互补的。他们不是竞争。 Tmpfs
只是提供内存文件作为 glibc
实现技术的文件系统。
So, when you actually use POSIX shared memory (which i used before, too), then glibc
will create a file at /dev/shm
, which is used to share data between the applications. The file-descriptor it returns will refer to that file, which you can pass to mmap
to tell it to map that file into memory, like it can do with any "real" file either. The techniques you listed are thus complementary. They are not competing. Tmpfs
is just the file-system that provides in-memory files as an implementation technique for glibc
.
例如,在我的盒子上运行了一个进程,目前已经注册了这样一个共享内存对象:
As an example, there is a process running on my box currently having registered such a shared memory object:
# pwd
/dev/shm
# ls -lh
insgesamt 76K
-r-------- 1 js js 65M 24. Mai 16:37 pulse-shm-1802989683
#
这篇关于Shmem vs tmpfs vs mmap的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!