构建LISP机器需要多少个原语？十，七或五？ [英] How many primitives does it take to build a LISP machine? Ten, seven or five?

问题描述

在这个网站上，他们说有10个LISP原语。
原语是： atom，quote，eq，car，cdr，cons，cond，lambda，label，apply 。

On this site they say there are 10 LISP primitives. The primitives are: atom, quote, eq, car, cdr, cons, cond, lambda, label, apply.

http：//hyperpolyglot.wikidot.com/lisp#ten-primitives

Stevey认为有七（或五）个：

Stevey reckons there are seven (or five):

Its part of the purity of the idea of LISP: you only need the seven (or is 
it five?) primitives to build the full machine.

http://steve-yegge.blogspot.com/2006/04/lisp-is-not-acceptable-lisp.html

构建LISP机器的原语的最小数目是多少（即可以在LISP代码上运行eval / value函数）？

What is the minimum number of primitives to build a LISP machine (ie something that can run an eval/value function on LISP code)? (And which ones are they?)

（我可以理解，你可以不用 atom，label和apply

(I can understand you could live without atom, label and apply)

推荐答案

请参阅此其他问题< a>从Paul Graham的一组7个原语中构造宏。

See this other question to construct macros from Paul Graham's set of 7 primitives.

这篇关于构建LISP机器需要多少个原语？十，七或五？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！