Ruby企业版vs Ruby 1.9 [英] Ruby Enterprise Edition vs Ruby 1.9

问题描述

我打算建立一个网站，这将是一个简单的CMS，用户可以通过视频，照片和文字提交和查看帖子。

make是在Ruby企业版和Ruby 1.9之间选择。

我关心的事情是：

1. 性能&可扩展性。


2. 与现有的gem /插件/开源项目的兼容性。


3. 开发和部署速度（我将部署在VPS上）。

您的建议是什么？

解决方案

根据我的经验，REE倾向于将malloc放在奇怪的地方（2009年1月的选项卡在脚本/控制台中完成 - https://webrat.lighthouseapp.com/projects/10503/tickets/89-excessive-output-caused-by- and-only-by-running-webrat ）。

Ruby 1.9.1在tempfile中有一个巨大的错误，导致Rack（2009年8月出现在patchlevel 243 - http://groups.google.com/group/rack-devel/browse_thread/thread/a2aab3a4720f34c4?pli=1 ）。除此之外，我不相信Ruby 1.9.1已经正确测试与Rails 2.3.4（字符串专有或 - https://rails.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8994-ruby-on-rails/tickets/3144-undefined -method-for-string-ror-234 ）。

说实话，这取决于你对惊喜的反应。我在运行2.3.3的服务器上使用1.9.1的旧补丁级别，而在Net :: HTTP中使用的补丁与ActiveResource一起使用，运行速度非常快。

更新10/10/2010 b

现在，我的问题的答案是无效的，Ruby EE和1.9.2都是非常好的Ruby实现。

相当肯定我会选择哪一个，大概是1.9.2 - 或者坚持说出什么是phusion们正在努力，因为他们正在研究一个1.9版本的REE - 但是，他们的1.8.7 REE是非常坚实。 p>

I'm planning to build a website that will be a simple CMS where users submit and view postings with videos, photos and text.

One decision I want to make is choosing between Ruby Enterprise Edition and Ruby 1.9.

Things I care about in order:

1. Performance & Scalability.
2. Compatibility with existing gems/plugins/open source projects.
3. Speed of development and deployment (I will be deploying on a VPS).

What is your suggestion?

解决方案

REE from my experience has a tendency to throw mallocs in odd places (Jan 2009 tab completion in script/console - https://webrat.lighthouseapp.com/projects/10503/tickets/89-excessive-output-caused-by-and-only-by-running-webrat).

Ruby 1.9.1 has a massive bug in tempfile which blows up Rack (August 2009 present in patchlevel 243 - http://groups.google.com/group/rack-devel/browse_thread/thread/a2aab3a4720f34c4?pli=1). As well as this I do not believe Ruby 1.9.1 to have been tested properly with Rails 2.3.4 (String exclusive or - https://rails.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8994-ruby-on-rails/tickets/3144-undefined-method-for-string-ror-234).

Quite honestly, it depends on how well you react to surprises. I use an old patchlevel of 1.9.1 on a server running 2.3.3 and other than a patch in Net::HTTP to work with ActiveResource, it runs blazingly fast.

If you don't like surprises, stick to 1.8.7.

Update 10/10/2010

The answer to my question is invalid nowadays, both Ruby EE and 1.9.2 are very good implementations of Ruby!

I'm not quite sure which one I would pick, probably 1.9.2 - or hold out to say what the phusion guys are working on, since they are working on a 1.9 version of REE - but, their 1.8.7 REE is pretty solid.

这篇关于Ruby企业版vs Ruby 1.9的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！