为什么TBitBtn包含的字形如此丑陋和过时? [英] Why are the glyphs included with TBitBtn so ugly and outdated?
问题描述
也许只是我,但我很想看到Embarcadero征求(或雇用)图形设计师改善这些图标。
哦,我希望控件会死: - / ...它是在Delphi 1中引入的,目标是16位Windows 3.x.那时候,按钮上的小字形非常小巧,装扮了UI。 (记住BWCC?)我认为UI标准要低得多,因为每次看到这些字形的应用程序时,我都很沮丧...它们主要包括用于向后兼容的目的。
只需坚持一个常规的TButton,这是一个本机的Windows控件,现在本机支持更多的风格,甚至比TBitBtn(我们也是元音挑战在那些日子)。如果你只需要在按钮上加上一个字形,Delphi / RAD Studio XE就可以从GlyFX(http://www.glyfx.com/)下载大量免费,更现代的字型。
The glyphs associated with TBitBtn for even Delphi 2010 are choppy and "ugly". Is there a backwards-compatibility reason that they remain? Does Embarcadero include updated png replacements that I could use instead of these normal glyphs?
Maybe it's just me, but I'd love to see Embarcadero solicit (or hire) graphic designers to improve these icons.
Oh how I wish that control would just die :-/... It was introduced in Delphi 1, which targeted 16bit Windows 3.x. At that time little glyphs on buttons were very novel and "dressed up" the UI. (Remember BWCC?) I suppose the UI standards were much lower then, because I cringe every time I see an application with those glyphs... They are mainly included for backward compatibility purposes.
Just stick with a regular TButton, which is a native Windows control and now natively supports more styles than even the TBitBtn (we were vowel challenged in those days, too). If you simply must include a glyph on the button Delphi/RAD Studio XE includes a whole host of free, more modern, glyphs from GlyFX (http://www.glyfx.com/).
这篇关于为什么TBitBtn包含的字形如此丑陋和过时?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!