为什么浏览器不使用SRV记录？ [英] Why do browsers not use SRV records?

问题描述

为什么浏览器不使用SRV记录？

这似乎是一个很少的工作，它将使服务器端实现可靠的网站更简单。 / p>

例如，您可以指定层级，使www.example.com解析为1.2.3.4和2.3.4.5，并且只有当这些都不可用时，请尝试4.5 .6.7。

SRV记录已存在多年...

有没有什么我错过的这里？

解决方案

Jonathan de Boyne Pollard提供以下常见答案。

你已经来到这个页面，因为你已经说过类似于以下内容：

SRV记录支持甚至没有进入Web浏览器，更不用说客户端不常见的协议。

这是常见的答案这样的陈述。

Why do browsers not use SRV records?

It seems like a minimal amount of work and it will make the server-side implementation of reliable websites much simpler.

For example, you can specify tiers, such that www.example.com resolves to 1.2.3.4 and 2.3.4.5, and only if neither of those are available, try 4.5.6.7.

SRV records have been around for years...

Is there something I'm missing here?

解决方案

Jonathan de Boyne Pollard provides the following Frequently Given Answer.

You've come to this page because you've said something similar to the following:

SRV record support hasn't even made it into web browsers yet, let alone clients of less-common protocols.

This is the Frequently Given Answer to such statements.

这篇关于为什么浏览器不使用SRV记录？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！