Eclipse作为IDE + Mercurial进行版本控制+？错误跟踪=好主意？ [英] Eclipse as IDE + Mercurial for version control + ? Bug tracking = Good idea?
问题描述
- Eclipse作为IDE
- 某种错误跟踪软件
我听说过错误跟踪软件，你可以把它修改为一个未解决的错误，当你检查它。我没有使用任何这样的解决方案，但它听起来不错。是否有任何良好的错误跟踪应用程序与Eclipse和Mercurial结合使用，并让您将更改与未解决的错误相结合？如果没有，至少有很好的插件可供Eclipse使用Mercurial进行版本控制？是否支持 hg rename 和 hg copy ？
如果我可以使用上述三个组件的组合获得好的工作，我打算将哈德森投入组合。为了能够跟踪代码库中的变化如何影响我们的单元测试。
首先，我想要上述问题的反馈。但是，我会感谢有关处理版本控制，错误跟踪和Eclipse集成的任何想法。
根据我的经验，MercurialEclipse插件，在作品中相当好 - 据我所知，这里没有人评论，实际上已经使用了，所以不要仅仅依靠这些观点做出决定。你可能会更好地自己测试。正如我之前说的 - 它适用于我。
免责声明：我参与了开发插件...
For a new Java web project I thought about using:
- Eclipse as IDE
- Mercurial for version control
- Some kind of bug tracking software
I have heard of bug tracking software where you can tie a change to an unresolved bug when you check it in. I haven't used any such solution myself, but it sounds good. Are there any good bug tracking applications which work well in combination with Eclipse and Mercurial and lets you tie a change to an unresolved bug? And if not, are there at least good plug ins for Eclipse to use Mercurial for version control? Would it support hg rename and hg copy?
If I can get something good working using a mix of the above three components I plan on throwing Hudson into the mix as well. To be able to track how changes in the code base affects our unit tests.
First of all I want feedback on the above question. But I would appreciate any thoughts regarding handling versioning, bug tracking and their integration into Eclipse.
In my experience the MercurialEclipse plug-in works quite well - as far as I understood, nobody commenting here has actually used it, so don't base your decisions solely on those opinions. You'd probably be better off to test it yourself. As I said before - it works for me.
Disclaimer: I've participated in developing the plug-in...
这篇关于Eclipse作为IDE + Mercurial进行版本控制+？错误跟踪=好主意？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
