电邮地址是否值得混淆,以防止收割? [英] Is it still worth obfuscating email-addresses to prevent harvesting?

查看:274
本文介绍了电邮地址是否值得混淆,以防止收割?的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

我想知道,为了防止电子邮件收获这些天,实施电子邮件混淆技术真的值得吗?我的初步想法不过是我可能错了。我的(可能不正确的)参数:




  • 垃圾邮件过滤和检测在这些天(在查看我的Gmail邮箱超过90%的邮件我收到的是垃圾邮件,但是我的收件箱中没有结果)。对于大多数其他电子邮件服务来说,这样做是否安全?

  • 大多数技术并不是针对高级收获脚本的100%证明,所以一切努力都是徒劳的。



您可能会认为模糊电子邮件地址并不麻烦,但我注意到我们的客户很多通过我们的CMS输入他们的电子邮件地址,要求我从文本中过滤掉电子邮件地址,并用一个混淆的版本替换,这显然是一个麻烦。



我想听到其他人想知道相同或实际证明我错了:)

解决方案

如果是你的地址,你可以做任何你认为合适的事情。



如果不是你的地址,你可能会问业主。 (或检查DNS,看它是否托管在Google Apps上)



正如我所描述的这里,甚至可以阻止最先进的收割机。 (除非他们专门针对您的网站并使用脚本)


I was wondering, is it really worth the trouble to implement email-obfuscation techniques in order to prevent emails from being harvested these days? My initial thought is no but i might be wrong. My (possibly inaccurate) arguments:

  • spam filtering and detection is superior these days (when looking at my gmail spambox over 90% of all mail i receive is spam but none ends up in my inbox). Is it safe to assume the same for most other email services?
  • most techniques aren't 100% proof against advanced harvesting scripts so all effort could be in vain.

You might argue that it's no trouble to obfuscate an e-mail address but i notice a lot of our clients enter their e-mail addresses through our CMS which thus requires me to filter out the e-mail adresses from the text and replace it with an obfuscated version which obviously is a little more trouble.

I'd like to hear from other people wondering the same or actually proving me wrong :)

解决方案

If it's your address, you can do whatever you see fit.

If it's not your address, you might want to ask the owners. (Or check DNS to see if it's hosted on Google Apps)

As I described here, it is possible to block even the most advanced harvesters. (Unless they specifically target your site and work with the script)

这篇关于电邮地址是否值得混淆,以防止收割?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆