如何通过在Swift中忽略其关联值来比较枚举与关联值? [英] How to compare enum with associated values by ignoring its associated value in Swift?

查看:172
本文介绍了如何通过在Swift中忽略其关联值来比较枚举与关联值?的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

阅读如何测试Swift枚举的平等与相关值,我实现了以下枚举:

After reading How to test equality of Swift enums with associated values, I implemented the following enum:

enum CardRank {
    case Number(Int)
    case Jack
    case Queen
    case King
    case Ace
}

func ==(a: CardRank, b: CardRank) -> Bool {
    switch (a, b) {
    case (.Number(let a), .Number(let b))   where a == b: return true
    case (.Jack, .Jack): return true
    case (.Queen, .Queen): return true
    case (.King, .King): return true
    case (.Ace, .Ace): return true
    default: return false
    }
}

以下代码作品:

let card: CardRank = CardRank.Jack
if card == CardRank.Jack {
    print("You played a jack!")
} else if card == CardRank.Number(2) {
    print("A two cannot be played at this time.")
}

但是,这不编译:

let number = CardRank.Number(5)
if number == CardRank.Number {
    print("You must play a face card!")
}

...并提供以下错误消息:

... and it gives the following error message:


二进制运算符'=='不能应用于o CardRank和(Int) - > CardRank'的类型

Binary operator '==' cannot be applied to operands of type 'CardRank' and '(Int) -> CardRank'

我假设这是因为它期待一个完整的类型而$ code> CardRank.Number 没有指定整个类型,而$ code> CardRank.Number(2)没有。但是,在这种情况下,我希望它匹配任何号码;不仅仅是一个特定的一个。

I'm assuming this is because it's expecting a full type and CardRank.Number does not specify an entire type, whereas CardRank.Number(2) did. However, in this case, I want it to match any number; not just a specific one.

显然我可以使用switch语句,但是实现 == 运算符是避免这种详细的解决方案:

Obviously I can use a switch statement, but the whole point of implementing the == operator was to avoid this verbose solution:

switch number {
case .Number:
    print("You must play a face card!")
default:
    break
}

有没有办法将枚举与关联值进行比较,忽略其关联值?

Is there any way to compare an enum with associated values while ignoring its associated value?

注意:我意识到我可以将 == 方法中的情况更改为 case(.Number,.Number):return true 虽然它会正确返回,但我的比较仍将看起来像是与特定数字相比较( number == CardRank.Number(2);其中2是一个虚拟值)而不是任何号码( number == CardRank.Number )。

Note: I realize that I could change the case in the == method to case (.Number, .Number): return true, but, although it would return true correctly, my comparison would still look like its being compared to a specific number (number == CardRank.Number(2); where 2 is a dummy value) rather than any number (number == CardRank.Number).

推荐答案

编辑:正如Etan指出的那样,你可以省略(_)通配符匹配,以更干净地使用。

As Etan points out, you can omit the (_) wildcard match to use this more cleanly.

不幸的是,我不相信在Swift 1.2中有一个比开关方法更容易的方法。

Unfortunately, I don't believe that there's an easier way than your switch approach in Swift 1.2.

在Swift 2但是,您可以使用新的 if-case 模式匹配:

In Swift 2, however, you can use the new if-case pattern match:

let number = CardRank.Number(5)
if case .Number(_) = number {
    // Is a number
} else {
    // Something else
}

如果您想避免冗长,可以考虑添加 isNumber 计算属性到你的枚举,实现你的switch语句。

If you're looking to avoid verbosity, you might consider adding an isNumber computed property to your enum that implements your switch statement.

这篇关于如何通过在Swift中忽略其关联值来比较枚举与关联值?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆