合法的网址搜索引擎优化？ [英] Legitimate URL Cloaking for SEO?

问题描述

我刚刚问过这两个问题，一个是关于 Flash网址最佳做法和一个在网址重定向在闪光灯搜索引擎优化，让我读更多关于隐藏和偷偷转向的javascript重定向。

在

提供文字内容在noscript标记中使用JavaScript ...确保在两个元素中都提供相同的内容（例如，在JavaScript中提供与noscript标记相同的文本）。在交替元素中包含大量不同的内容可能会导致Google在该网站上采取行动。

使用JavaScript是完全合法的网络操作。然而，用来欺骗搜索引擎的JavaScript并不是。例如，在JavaScript中放置不同于noscript标记的文本违反了我们的网站管理员指南，因为它为用户（查看基于JavaScript的文本）显示的内容不同于搜索引擎（查看基于无脚本的文本）的不同内容。对于我来说，听起来像，如果你有一个Flash网站，你想它是搜索引擎优化，那么如果你渲染到谷歌的HTML页面的文字内容与flash swf相同，那么你是安全的。只要我不是意图欺骗搜索引擎而不是<$ c



















$ b $`我也从这一组网站管理员的指导方针，可以接受像 site.com/home.html 的网址重定向到网站。 com /＃/ home 为Flash用户，因为意图不是欺骗，如果他们只是不同的查看，机智h模式保持不变，是合法的吗？

他们在那篇文章中也说过：

请注意，在JavaScript中放置链接本身并不具有欺骗性。当检查您的网站上的JavaScript，以确保您的网站坚持我们的指导方针，考虑意图。

...所以它似乎这将是一个合法的解决方案，没有？也就是说，重定向用户到适当的Flash网址，并提供必要的可访问性和搜索引擎优化html。

我明白恶意这可能是由于偷偷摸摸和掩饰，但这绝对不是意图，我正在寻找更多的事情，我怎么能做到这一点，而不谷歌生气？

老实说，我不知道谷歌如何在Rails中添加一些检查用户代理的东西，并使用类似下面的方法为google提供了一个非flash的html页面：关闭机器人导轨会话。如果我检查了用户代理和只重定向的用户，而不是谷歌bot，谷歌将能够看到？

更新

是这样的 Fleb Flash Framework 隐形？它们有一个 div 元素，它可以返回一个flash swf或纯html内容。或者 SEO with Flash

解决方案

您可能对Google的改进了Flash索引功能。即使有一个纯粹的Flash网站，你仍然可以得到良好的搜索引擎优化，尤其是你得到高质量的入站链接。

你计划的重定向技术听起来是合法的，但Google的索引算法仍然存在可疑的风险。

I have just asked these two questions, one on flash seo url best practices and one on url redirects for seo in flash, and it got me to read more about cloaking and sneaky javascript redirects.

In that cloaking and sneaky javascript redirects article, it says:

"Provide the textual contents of JavaScript in a noscript tag... Ensure that you provide the same content in both elements (for instance, provide the same text in the JavaScript as in the noscript tag). Including substantially different content in the alternate element may cause Google to take action on the site."

"Use of JavaScript is an entirely legitimate web practice. However, use of JavaScript with the intent to deceive search engines is not. For instance, placing different text in JavaScript than in a noscript tag violates our webmaster guidelines because it displays different content for users (who see the JavaScript-based text) than for search engines (which see the noscript-based text)."

To me that sounds like, if you have a Flash site, and you want it to be SEO, then if you render to google an html page with the same textual content as the flash swf, then you are safe. As long as I am not "with the intent to deceive search engines" and am not "including substantially different content in the alternate [flash] element", am I safe? Is that legitimate? Has anyone verified this?

I also get from that set of webmaster guidelines that it would be acceptable to redirect a url like site.com/home.html to site.com/#/home for flash users, because the intent is not to deceive and if they are only differing by the "View", with the "Model" staying the same, is that legitimate?

They say in that article too:

"Note that placement of links within JavaScript is alone not deceptive. When examining JavaScript on your site to ensure your site adheres to our guidelines, consider the intent."

... so it seems like this would be a legitimate solution, no? That is, redirecting users to the appropriate flash url, and rendering html for necessary accessibility and SEO.

I understand the malicious-ness that can arise out of sneakyness and cloaking, but that is definitely not the intent. I am looking for something more along the lines of, how could I accomplish this without google getting angry?

I honestly don't see how google would be able to tell if I added something in Rails that checked for the user agent and rendered a flash-less html page for google using something like this: turn off rails sessions for robots. If I checked for the user agent and only redirected the user, not the google bot, would google be able to see that?

Update

Is something like this Fleb Flash Framework "cloaking"? They have a div element which, either returns a flash swf or plain html content. Or this on SEO with Flash

解决方案

You might be interested in Google's improved Flash indexing capabilities. Even with a pure Flash site you can still get good SEO, especially of you're getting high quality inbound links.

The redirection technique you're planning sounds legitimate, but there's still a risk it might appear suspicious to Google's indexing algorithms.

这篇关于合法的网址搜索引擎优化？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！