安卓5.0 - 添加页眉/页脚到RecyclerView [英] Android 5.0 - Add header/footer to a RecyclerView
问题描述
我花了片刻，试图找出一种方法来一个头添加到RecyclerView，失败。 这是我到目前为止有：
I spent a moment trying to figure out a way to add a header to a RecyclerView, unsuccessfully. This is what I got so far :
@Override
protected void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState)
{
...
layouManager = new LinearLayoutManager(getActivity());
recyclerView.setLayoutManager(layouManager);
LayoutInflater inflater = (LayoutInflater) getActivity().getSystemService(Context.LAYOUT_INFLATER_SERVICE);
headerPlaceHolder = inflater.inflate(R.layout.view_header_holder_medium, null, false);
layouManager.addView(headerPlaceHolder, 0);
...
}
在布局管理似乎是处理RecyclerView项目的配置对象。因为我无法找到任何 addHeaderView（查看视图）的方法，我决定去与LayoutManager的 addView（查看视图，INT位置）的方法，并增加我的头图，表现得像一个头第一的位置。
The LayoutManager seems to be the object handling the disposition of the RecyclerView items. As I couldn't find any addHeaderView(View view) method, I decided to go with the LayoutManager's addView(View view, int position) method and to add my header view in first position to act like a header.
Aaand这就是事情变得丑陋：
Aaand this is where things get uglier :
java.lang.NullPointerException: Attempt to read from field 'android.support.v7.widget.RecyclerView$ViewHolder android.support.v7.widget.RecyclerView$LayoutParams.mViewHolder' on a null object reference
at android.support.v7.widget.RecyclerView.getChildViewHolderInt(RecyclerView.java:2497)
at android.support.v7.widget.RecyclerView$LayoutManager.addViewInt(RecyclerView.java:4807)
at android.support.v7.widget.RecyclerView$LayoutManager.addView(RecyclerView.java:4803)
at com.mathieumaree.showz.fragments.CategoryFragment.setRecyclerView(CategoryFragment.java:231)
at com.mathieumaree.showz.fragments.CategoryFragment.access$200(CategoryFragment.java:47)
at com.mathieumaree.showz.fragments.CategoryFragment$2.success(CategoryFragment.java:201)
at com.mathieumaree.showz.fragments.CategoryFragment$2.success(CategoryFragment.java:196)
at retrofit.CallbackRunnable$1.run(CallbackRunnable.java:41)
at android.os.Handler.handleCallback(Handler.java:739)
at android.os.Handler.dispatchMessage(Handler.java:95)
at android.os.Looper.loop(Looper.java:135)
at android.app.ActivityThread.main(ActivityThread.java:5221)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Native Method)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:372)
at com.android.internal.os.ZygoteInit$MethodAndArgsCaller.run(ZygoteInit.java:899)
at com.android.internal.os.ZygoteInit.main(ZygoteInit.java:694)
让经过数 NullPointerException异常试图调用 addView（查看视图）的活动创造不同时刻（也尝试添加视图一旦一切都成立，即使适配器的数据），我意识到我不知道如果这是正确的方式做到这一点（和它看起来并不如此）。
After getting several NullPointerExceptions trying to call the addView(View view) at different moments of the Activity creation (also tried adding the view once everything is set up, even the Adapter's data), I realized I have no idea if this is the right way to do it (and it doesn't look to be).
有人能帮助我吗？或者至少给我一些想法/新的方向去探索？
Could somebody help me? Or at least give me some idea / new direction to explore?
在此先感谢！
VieuMa
PS：另外，一个能够处理GridLayoutManager除了LinearLayoutManager的解决方案将是非常美联社preciated
PS: Also, a solution that could handle the GridLayoutManager in addition to the LinearLayoutManager would be really appreciated!
推荐答案
我有同样的问题的棒棒糖并创建了两种方法来包装 Recyclerview 适配器。一个是pretty的易于使用的，但我不知道它的行为方式与不断变化的数据集。因为它包装适配器，你需要让自己一定要调用像 notifyDataSetChanged 方法正确的适配器对象。
I had the same problem on Lollipop and created two approaches to wrap the Recyclerview adapter. One is pretty easy to use, but I'm not sure how it will behave with a changing dataset. Because it wraps your adapter and you need to make yourself sure to call methods like notifyDataSetChanged on the right adapter-object.
的其他不应该有这样的问题。只要让你的常规的适配器扩展类，实现抽象方法，你应该准备好。在这里，他们是：
The other shouldn't have such problems. Just let your regular adapter extend the class, implement the abstract methods and you should be ready. And here they are:
学家
- HeaderRecyclerViewAdapterV1.java 使用
新HeaderRecyclerViewAdapterV1（新RegularAdapter（））; - HeaderRecyclerViewAdapterV2.java 使用
RegularAdapter延伸HeaderRecyclerViewAdapterV2
- HeaderRecyclerViewAdapterV1.java usage
new HeaderRecyclerViewAdapterV1(new RegularAdapter()); - HeaderRecyclerViewAdapterV2.java usage
RegularAdapter extends HeaderRecyclerViewAdapterV2
HeaderRecyclerViewAdapterV1
import android.support.v7.widget.RecyclerView;
import android.view.ViewGroup;
/**
* Created by sebnapi on 08.11.14.
* <p/>
* This is a Plug-and-Play Approach for adding a Header or Footer to
* a RecyclerView backed list
* <p/>
* Just wrap your regular adapter like this
* <p/>
* new HeaderRecyclerViewAdapterV1(new RegularAdapter())
* <p/>
* Let RegularAdapter implement HeaderRecyclerView, FooterRecyclerView or both
* and you are ready to go.
* <p/>
* I'm absolutely not sure how this will behave with changes in the dataset.
* You can always wrap a fresh adapter and make sure to not change the old one or
* use my other approach.
* <p/>
* With the other approach you need to let your Adapter extend HeaderRecyclerViewAdapterV2
* (and therefore change potentially more code) but possible omit these shortcomings.
* <p/>
* TOTALLY UNTESTED - USE WITH CARE - HAVE FUN :)
*/
public class HeaderRecyclerViewAdapterV1 extends RecyclerView.Adapter {
private static final int TYPE_HEADER = Integer.MIN_VALUE;
private static final int TYPE_FOOTER = Integer.MIN_VALUE + 1;
private static final int TYPE_ADAPTEE_OFFSET = 2;
private final RecyclerView.Adapter mAdaptee;
public HeaderRecyclerViewAdapterV1(RecyclerView.Adapter adaptee) {
mAdaptee = adaptee;
}
public RecyclerView.Adapter getAdaptee() {
return mAdaptee;
}
@Override
public RecyclerView.ViewHolder onCreateViewHolder(ViewGroup parent, int viewType) {
if (viewType == TYPE_HEADER && mAdaptee instanceof HeaderRecyclerView) {
return ((HeaderRecyclerView) mAdaptee).onCreateHeaderViewHolder(parent, viewType);
} else if (viewType == TYPE_FOOTER && mAdaptee instanceof FooterRecyclerView) {
return ((FooterRecyclerView) mAdaptee).onCreateFooterViewHolder(parent, viewType);
}
return mAdaptee.onCreateViewHolder(parent, viewType - TYPE_ADAPTEE_OFFSET);
}
@Override
public void onBindViewHolder(RecyclerView.ViewHolder holder, int position) {
if (position == 0 && holder.getItemViewType() == TYPE_HEADER && useHeader()) {
((HeaderRecyclerView) mAdaptee).onBindHeaderView(holder, position);
} else if (position == mAdaptee.getItemCount() && holder.getItemViewType() == TYPE_FOOTER && useFooter()) {
((FooterRecyclerView) mAdaptee).onBindFooterView(holder, position);
} else {
mAdaptee.onBindViewHolder(holder, position - (useHeader() ? 1 : 0));
}
}
@Override
public int getItemCount() {
int itemCount = mAdaptee.getItemCount();
if (useHeader()) {
itemCount += 1;
}
if (useFooter()) {
itemCount += 1;
}
return itemCount;
}
private boolean useHeader() {
if (mAdaptee instanceof HeaderRecyclerView) {
return true;
}
return false;
}
private boolean useFooter() {
if (mAdaptee instanceof FooterRecyclerView) {
return true;
}
return false;
}
@Override
public int getItemViewType(int position) {
if (position == 0 && useHeader()) {
return TYPE_HEADER;
}
if (position == mAdaptee.getItemCount() && useFooter()) {
return TYPE_FOOTER;
}
if (mAdaptee.getItemCount() >= Integer.MAX_VALUE - TYPE_ADAPTEE_OFFSET) {
new IllegalStateException("HeaderRecyclerViewAdapter offsets your BasicItemType by " + TYPE_ADAPTEE_OFFSET + ".");
}
return mAdaptee.getItemViewType(position) + TYPE_ADAPTEE_OFFSET;
}
public static interface HeaderRecyclerView {
public RecyclerView.ViewHolder onCreateHeaderViewHolder(ViewGroup parent, int viewType);
public void onBindHeaderView(RecyclerView.ViewHolder holder, int position);
}
public static interface FooterRecyclerView {
public RecyclerView.ViewHolder onCreateFooterViewHolder(ViewGroup parent, int viewType);
public void onBindFooterView(RecyclerView.ViewHolder holder, int position);
}
}
HeaderRecyclerViewAdapterV2
import android.support.v7.widget.RecyclerView;
import android.view.ViewGroup;
/**
* Created by sebnapi on 08.11.14.
* <p/>
* If you extend this Adapter you are able to add a Header, a Footer or both
* by a similar ViewHolder pattern as in RecyclerView.
* <p/>
* If you want to omit changes to your class hierarchy you can try the Plug-and-Play
* approach HeaderRecyclerViewAdapterV1.
* <p/>
* Don't override (Be careful while overriding)
* - onCreateViewHolder
* - onBindViewHolder
* - getItemCount
* - getItemViewType
* <p/>
* You need to override the abstract methods introduced by this class. This class
* is not using generics as RecyclerView.Adapter make yourself sure to cast right.
* <p/>
* TOTALLY UNTESTED - USE WITH CARE - HAVE FUN :)
*/
public abstract class HeaderRecyclerViewAdapterV2 extends RecyclerView.Adapter {
private static final int TYPE_HEADER = Integer.MIN_VALUE;
private static final int TYPE_FOOTER = Integer.MIN_VALUE + 1;
private static final int TYPE_ADAPTEE_OFFSET = 2;
@Override
public RecyclerView.ViewHolder onCreateViewHolder(ViewGroup parent, int viewType) {
if (viewType == TYPE_HEADER) {
return onCreateHeaderViewHolder(parent, viewType);
} else if (viewType == TYPE_FOOTER) {
return onCreateFooterViewHolder(parent, viewType);
}
return onCreateBasicItemViewHolder(parent, viewType - TYPE_ADAPTEE_OFFSET);
}
@Override
public void onBindViewHolder(RecyclerView.ViewHolder holder, int position) {
if (position == 0 && holder.getItemViewType() == TYPE_HEADER) {
onBindHeaderView(holder, position);
} else if (position == getBasicItemCount() && holder.getItemViewType() == TYPE_FOOTER) {
onBindFooterView(holder, position);
} else {
onBindBasicItemView(holder, position - (useHeader() ? 1 : 0));
}
}
@Override
public int getItemCount() {
int itemCount = getBasicItemCount();
if (useHeader()) {
itemCount += 1;
}
if (useFooter()) {
itemCount += 1;
}
return itemCount;
}
@Override
public int getItemViewType(int position) {
if (position == 0 && useHeader()) {
return TYPE_HEADER;
}
if (position == getBasicItemCount() && useFooter()) {
return TYPE_FOOTER;
}
if (getBasicItemType(position) >= Integer.MAX_VALUE - TYPE_ADAPTEE_OFFSET) {
new IllegalStateException("HeaderRecyclerViewAdapter offsets your BasicItemType by " + TYPE_ADAPTEE_OFFSET + ".");
}
return getBasicItemType(position) + TYPE_ADAPTEE_OFFSET;
}
public abstract boolean useHeader();
public abstract RecyclerView.ViewHolder onCreateHeaderViewHolder(ViewGroup parent, int viewType);
public abstract void onBindHeaderView(RecyclerView.ViewHolder holder, int position);
public abstract boolean useFooter();
public abstract RecyclerView.ViewHolder onCreateFooterViewHolder(ViewGroup parent, int viewType);
public abstract void onBindFooterView(RecyclerView.ViewHolder holder, int position);
public abstract RecyclerView.ViewHolder onCreateBasicItemViewHolder(ViewGroup parent, int viewType);
public abstract void onBindBasicItemView(RecyclerView.ViewHolder holder, int position);
public abstract int getBasicItemCount();
/**
* make sure you don't use [Integer.MAX_VALUE-1, Integer.MAX_VALUE] as BasicItemViewType
*
* @param position
* @return
*/
public abstract int getBasicItemType(int position);
}
反馈和叉子AP preciated。我将使用 HeaderRecyclerViewAdapterV2 通过我的自我和发展，测试和发布的未来变化。
Feedback and forks appreciated. I will use HeaderRecyclerViewAdapterV2 by my self and evolve, test and post the changes in the future.
修改：@OvidiuLatcu是的，我遇到了一些问题。其实我停下来抵消头隐含位置 - （useHeader（）？1：0），而是创建了一个公用的方法 INT offsetPosition（INT位置） 吧。因为如果你设置了 OnItemTouchListener 上Recyclerview，您可以拦截触摸，看一下X，触摸y坐标，找到根据子视图，然后呼叫 recyclerView.getChildPosition（...），你总是会得到适配器中的非抵消地位！这是在RecyclerView code一shortcomming，我没有看到一个简单的方法来克服这一点。这就是为什么我现在偏移的位置明确的，当我需要在我的的的code。
EDIT: @OvidiuLatcu Yes I had some problems. Actually I stopped offsetting the Header implicitly by position - (useHeader() ? 1 : 0) and instead created a public method int offsetPosition(int position) for it. Because if you set an OnItemTouchListener on Recyclerview, you can intercept the touch, get the x,y coordinates of the touch, find the according child view and then call recyclerView.getChildPosition(...)and you will always get the non-offsetted position in the adapter! This is a shortcomming in the RecyclerView Code, I don't see an easy method to overcome this. This is why I now offset the positions explicit when I need to by my own code.
这篇关于安卓5.0 - 添加页眉/页脚到RecyclerView的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
