对象的泛型下界 [英] Generic lower bound to Object

查看:74
本文介绍了对象的泛型下界的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

可以将一个泛型参数绑定为:

  public< T super Object> void someMethod(T t); 

是否有这样一个绑定的有效用法?

解决方案

根据JLS http://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jls/se7/html/jls-4.html#jls-4.4 类型参数(< T

  TypeParameter:
TypeVariable TypeBound *

TypeBound:
extends TypeVariable
extends ClassOrInterfaceType AdditionalBoundList *

AdditionalBoundList:
AdditionalBound AdditionalBoundList
AdditionalBound

AdditionalBound:
&接口类型

* =可选

TypeBound ,仅指定 extends 的用法。
不幸的是,未指定使用 super 的下限类型参数。下限仅在通配符用法中指定( JLS#4.5.1


好的问题,让我在JLS中挖掘,我不知道为什么没有实现在java中,它只是没有指定。


It is possible to code a generic parameter bound as:

public <T super Object> void someMethod(T t);

Is there a valid usage of such a bound?

解决方案

According to the JLS http://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jls/se7/html/jls-4.html#jls-4.4 a type parameter (The < T extends Object > term) consists out of:

TypeParameter:
    TypeVariable TypeBound*

TypeBound:
    extends TypeVariable
    extends ClassOrInterfaceType AdditionalBoundList*

AdditionalBoundList:
    AdditionalBound AdditionalBoundList
    AdditionalBound

AdditionalBound:
    & InterfaceType

* = optional

You see the TypeBound, there is only the usage of extends specified. Unfortunately, a lower bound type parameter, using super, is not specified. A lower bound is only specified in the wildcard usage (JLS#4.5.1)

Good question, that got me digging in the JLS, and I don't know why this not implemented in java, it is just not specified.

这篇关于对象的泛型下界的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆