为什么我的'git分支'没有主人？ [英] Why does my 'git branch' have no master?

问题描述

我是git新手，我一直在阅读关于主分支的内容。 主人只是人们使用的传统名称，或者它具有像 HEAD ？

等特殊含义。当我在我拥有的克隆上做 git branch ，我只看到1个单独的分支 - 我正在使用的分支。根本没有主人。如果我输入 git checkout master （正如我在很多教程或指南中看到的那样），我得到

 错误：pathspec'master'与git已知的任何文件都不匹配。 
  

我只是混淆了为什么我的克隆没有所有人似乎都暗示它总是存在。

解决方案

大多数Git仓库使用 master 作为主（和默认）分支 - 如果你通过 git init 初始化一个新的Git仓库，它将有<$ c



然而，如果你克隆一个版本库，你的默认分支就是远程的 HEAD 指向（ HEAD 实际上是指向分支名称的符号引用）。因此，如果您克隆的存储库中有 HEAD 指向 foo ，那么您的克隆将只有一个 foo 分支。

您从克隆的远程可能仍有 master 分支（你可以用 git ls-remote origin master 来检查），但是默认情况下你不会创建该分支的本地版本，因为 git clone 只检出远程的 HEAD 。

I'm a git newbie and I keep reading about a "master" branch. Is "master" just a conventional name that people used or does it have special meaning like HEAD?

When I do git branch on the clone that I have, I only see 1 single branch - the one I'm on. No "master" at all. If I type git checkout master (as I see in alot of tutorials or guides), I get

error: pathspec 'master' did not match any file(s) known to git.

I'm just confused as to why my clone doesn't have a master that everyone seems to imply that it always exists.

解决方案

Most Git repositories use master as the main (and default) branch - if you initialize a new Git repo via git init, it will have master checked out by default.

However, if you clone a repository, the default branch you have is whatever the remote's HEAD points to (HEAD is actually a symbolic ref that points to a branch name). So if the repository you cloned had a HEAD pointed to, say, foo, then your clone will just have a foo branch.

The remote you cloned from might still have a master branch (you could check with git ls-remote origin master), but you wouldn't have created a local version of that branch by default, because git clone only checks out the remote's HEAD.

这篇关于为什么我的'git分支'没有主人？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！