GIT:当有一个叫HEAD的分支时,如何明确地引用当前的HEAD? [英] GIT: How to unambiguously reference current HEAD when having a branch called HEAD?

查看:183
本文介绍了GIT:当有一个叫HEAD的分支时,如何明确地引用当前的HEAD?的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

即使HEAD对于Git分支的名称来说绝对是一个糟糕的选择,它仍然是一个有效的分支名称。如果你碰巧有一个名为HEAD的分支,有没有办法明确地引用实际的 HEAD 符号引用?



该分支可以被引用为 refs / heads / HEAD ,但是 HEAD 本身怎么样?



使用 HEAD 导致 refname'HEAD'含糊不清在任何以< commit> 作为参数传递的地方发生错误。

解决方案

根据 gitrevisions ,如果 HEAD refs / heads / HEAD 存在,所选修订为 HEAD (即不是名为 HEAD 的分支)。



这实际上是大多数的情况下,但 git checkout 更喜欢修订的分支名称,所以 git checkout HEAD 解决分支,而不是当前提交。



还有其他命令也可以选择分支名称,例如 git branch -f HEAD newrev git分支-D HEAD 引用分支,但在这里没有真正的模糊空间: git branch 明显地在分支上工作。



其他处理程序通常会将分支名称或修订说明符传递给 git rev -parse git rev-list ,这些行为与 gitrevisions



请注意,类似的情况可能会发生在更现实的分支名。就在昨天,我创建了一个处理某些以太网项目的分支,并将分支命名为 e1000 ...,它看起来像一个缩写的SHA-1。名为 facade的分支遭受同样的命运。


Even though "HEAD" is definitely a poor choice for the name of a Git branch, it is still a valid branch name. If you happen to have branch named "HEAD", is there a way how to unambiguously refer to the actual HEAD symbolic reference?

The branch can be referenced as refs/heads/HEAD, but what about the HEAD itself?

Using just HEAD results in an refname 'HEAD' is ambiguous error anywhere where a <commit> is passed as an argument.

解决方案

According to gitrevisions, if both HEAD and refs/heads/HEAD exist, the selected revision is HEAD (i.e., not the branch named HEAD).

This is in fact the correct answer for most situations, but git checkout prefers the branch-name to the revision, so git checkout HEAD resolves to the branch, rather than the current commit.

There are other commands that also choose the branch name, e.g., git branch -f HEAD newrev or git branch -D HEAD refers to the branch, but here there's no real room for ambiguity: git branch is obviously going to work on the branch.

Other handlers generally pass a branch name or a revision specifier to git rev-parse or git rev-list, and those behave as documented in gitrevisions.

Note that similar cases can occur with more realistic branch names. Just yesterday I created a branch for dealing with a certain ethernet items, and named the branch e1000 ... which looks like an abbreviated SHA-1. A branch named facade suffers the same fate.

这篇关于GIT:当有一个叫HEAD的分支时,如何明确地引用当前的HEAD?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆