Chrome扩展 - onRequest / sendRequest vs onMessage / sendMessage [英] Chrome Extensions - onRequest/sendRequest vs onMessage/sendMessage

问题描述

检出此示例扩展程序与 Chrome扩展中心中的页面关联看到他们使用

  chrome.extension.onRequest.addListener（onRequest）; 
  

在background.js页面中，以便听取contentscript.js和

  chrome.extension.sendRequest（{}，function（response）{}）; 
  

放入contentcript.js中，以便与background.js页面交谈。

但是我找不到这些函数的文档，这些函数在web和Google的消息传递指南只提及

  chrome.extension.sendMessage（...）
  

发送，以及

  chrome.extension.onMessage.addListener（...）
  

p>

我应该使用哪些函数？ sendRequest / onRequest是否过时？ Google的开发指南仍然是最新的吗？

看起来 sendMessage 优于 sendRequest ，这将被弃用： http://codereview.chromium.org/9965005/

Checking out this sample extension linked by a page in the Chrome Extension center, I see they used

chrome.extension.onRequest.addListener(onRequest);

in the background.js page in order to listen to the contentscript.js and

  chrome.extension.sendRequest({}, function(response) {});

in the contentscript.js in order to talk to the background.js page.

But I can't find the documentation for these functions anywhere in the web and Google's Message Passing guide only mentions

chrome.extension.sendMessage(...)

to send, and

chrome.extension.onMessage.addListener(...)

to listen.

Which functions should I use? Is sendRequest/onRequest obsolete? Is the Google's dev guide still up-to-date?

解决方案

It seems sendMessage is favored over sendRequest, which is to be deprecated: http://codereview.chromium.org/9965005/

这篇关于Chrome扩展 - onRequest / sendRequest vs onMessage / sendMessage的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！