FetchMode和FetchType之间的区别 [英] difference between FetchMode and FetchType

查看:184
本文介绍了FetchMode和FetchType之间的区别的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

指定 lazy =true并使用 fetch =select或join?哪一个比另一个优先?



问候
jayendra

解决方案

  @Entity 
@Table
public class父母{
@Id
私人长ID;

@OneToMany(mappedBy =parent,fetch = FetchType.EAGER)
@Fetch(FetchMode.JOIN)
private List< Child>儿童;
// getter setters
}


@Entity
@Table
public class Child {
@Id
私人长ID;

@ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
私有父母;

// getter setter
}

在上面的例子中,当获取 Parent 实体时,hibernate会使用join自动加载所有实体。另一方面,当你读取 Child 时, Parent 实体将不会被选中,除非您在您的代码 child.getParent()



FetchType(Lazy / Eager)告诉我们是否希望实体被加载或者懒惰,当有代码调用的时候。



FetchMode(Select / Join)告诉我们是否希望我们的实体被加载额外的select或者带有join或subselect的查询。


what is the difference in specifying lazy = "true" and using fetch = "select" or "join" ? which one is preferred over the other ?

regards jayendra

解决方案

Let's say we have entities like this:

@Entity
@Table
public class Parent {
    @Id
    private Long id;

    @OneToMany(mappedBy="parent", fetch = FetchType.EAGER)
    @Fetch(FetchMode.JOIN)
    private List<Child> child;    
    //getter setters
}


@Entity
@Table
public class Child {    
    @Id
    private Long id;

    @ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
    private Parent parent;

    //getter setter
}

In above example, when getting Parent entity, hibernate will automaticly load all child entities eagerly using join. On the other hand, when you fetch Child, Parent entity won't be selectet unless you call it explicity in your code child.getParent().

FetchType (Lazy/Eager) tells whether we want entity to be loaded eagerly or lazy, when there's call in code.

FetchMode (Select/Join) tells whether we want our entitity to be loaded with additional select or in one query with join or subselect.

这篇关于FetchMode和FetchType之间的区别的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆