企业应用的In House与Ad Hoc分布有什么区别？ [英] What is the difference between In House versus Ad Hoc distribution for Enterprise apps?

问题描述

我有一个Apple iOS Enterprise帐户，我正在创建一个分发配置文件，并且惊讶地发现我必须选择In House或Ad Hoc的分发方法。

I have an Apple iOS Enterprise account and am creating a distribution provisioning profile, and was surprised to see that I had to choose a distribution method of either In House or Ad Hoc.

这使我感到困惑 - 如果我为非企业帐户创建分发配置文件，那么此处的选择将是Ad Hoc或App store，这是有道理的，因为有不同的配置文件用于测试和发布。
但这是针对企业帐户的，我不明白企业应用程序的内部或Ad Hoc分配方法之间的区别。

This confused me - if I was creating a distribution profile for a non enterprise account then the choices here would be Ad Hoc or App store, this makes sense as there are different profiles for testing and for releasing. But this is for an enterprise account and I don't understand what the difference is between In House or Ad Hoc distribution methods for an Enterprise app.

推荐答案

必须为特定设备配置Ad-Hoc版本。您的帐户最多可以注册100个设备。

Ad-Hoc releases have to be provisioned to specific devices. Your account allows you to register up to 100 devices.

In-House将分发给任何公司设备。

In-House is for distribution to any company device.

所以在大多数情况下，内部可以提供服务你所有的需求。但是，如果您希望某个不属于您公司的人测试某些内容，或者您​​希望将分发限制到特定设备，则可以使用临时配置。

So in most cases In-House can serve all your needs. But in the event that you wanted someone who was not part of your company to test something or you wanted to restrict distribution to specific devices you could use the ad-hoc provisioning.

这篇关于企业应用的In House与Ad Hoc分布有什么区别？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！