加快Numpy数组/ OpenCV cv2映像的迭代速度 [英] Speed up iteration over Numpy arrays / OpenCV cv2 image

查看:165
本文介绍了加快Numpy数组/ OpenCV cv2映像的迭代速度的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

我有3个numpy形状阵列>(500,500)。我试图同时迭代它们。我尝试过两种不同的方法,但两种方法都很慢。

I have 3 numpy arrays of shape > (500, 500). I am trying to iterate over them simultaneously. I have tried two different methods but both of them are slow.

这里 Ix_Ix_blur Ix_Iy_blur Iy_Iy_blur 具有相同的大小。我正在尝试查找功能并在OpenCV图像上绘制。

Here Ix_Ix_blur, Ix_Iy_blur and Iy_Iy_blur are of the same size. I'm trying to find features and draw it on OpenCV image.

方法1:

for i in xrange (Ix_Ix_blur.shape[1]):
    for j in xrange(Ix_Ix_blur.shape[0]):
        A = np.array([ [Ix_Ix_blur[j][i], Ix_Iy_blur[j][i]], 
            [Ix_Iy_blur[j][i], Iy_Iy_blur[j][i]] ])
        detA = (A[0][0]*A[1][1])-(A[0][1]*A[1][0])
        traceA = A[0][0]+A[1][1]

        harmonic_mean = detA/traceA
        if(harmonic_mean > thresh):
            cv2.circle(img, (i,j), 1, (0, 0, 255), -1, 8)

这需要 7秒用于尺寸为512 * 512的图片

This takes around 7 seconds for image of size of 512*512

方法2 :

Ix_Iy_blur_iter = np.nditer(Ix_Iy_blur)
Iy_Iy_blur_iter = np.nditer(Iy_Iy_blur)
Ix_Ix_blur_iter = np.nditer(Ix_Ix_blur)

while(not Ix_Iy_blur_iter.finished):
    try:
        A = np.array([[Ix_Ix_blur_iter.next(), Ix_Iy_blur_iter.next()],[Ix_Iy_blur_iter.value, Iy_Iy_blur_iter.next()]])
    except StopIteration:
        break
    detA = (A[0][0]*A[1][1])-(A[0][1]*A[1][0])
    traceA = A[0][0]+A[1][1]

    harmonic_mean = detA/traceA
    if(harmonic_mean > thresh):
        i = Ix_Ix_blur_iter.iterindex/Ix.shape[0]
        j = Ix_Ix_blur_iter.iterindex - Ix.shape[0]*i
        cv2.circle(img, (j,i), 1, (0, 0, 255), -1, 8)

此方法似乎也似乎拿 7秒来迭代相同大小的图像。

This method also seems to take 7 seconds to iterate over the same size of image.

还有其他方法可以减少迭代所需的时间?

Is there any other way using which I can reduce the time required for iterations?

配置:


  • Ubuntu 12.04

  • 第三代核心i5处理器

  • 4 GB RAM

  • 2 GB ATI RADEON GPU(已关闭)

  • Ubuntu 12.04
  • 3rd Gen core i5 processor
  • 4 GB RAM
  • 2 GB ATI RADEON GPU (which I have turned off)

推荐答案

首先你可以使用 Ix_Ix_blur [j,i] 而不是 Ix_Ix_blur [j] [i] Ix_Ix_blur [j] [i] 将创建一个非常慢的临时数组。

First you can use Ix_Ix_blur[j, i] instead of Ix_Ix_blur[j][i]. Ix_Ix_blur[j][i] will create a temporary array which is very slow.

加速元素访问ndarray,你可以使用item()方法,它返回python本机数值,你不需要创建一个临时数组A.用本机数值计算比numpy标量快。

To speedup element access with ndarray, you can use item() method, which return python native numeric values, and you don't need to create a temporary array A. Calculation with native numeric values is faster than numpy scalars.

for i in xrange (Ix_Ix_blur.shape[1]):
    for j in xrange(Ix_Ix_blur.shape[0]):
        a, b, c = Ix_Ix_blur.item(j, i), Ix_Iy_blur.item(j, i), Iy_Iy_blur.item(j, i)
        detA = a*c - b*b
        traceA = a + c
        harmonic_mean = detA/traceA
        if harmonic_mean > thresh:
            cv2.circle(img, (i,j), 1, (0, 0, 255), -1, 8)

对于您的特定问题,没有必要在循环中进行计算,您可以:

For your particular problem, it's not necessary to do the calculation in a loop, you can:

detA = Ix_Ix_blur * Iy_Iy_blur - Ix_Iy_blur**2
traceA = Ix_Ix_blur + Iy_Iy_blur
harmonic_mean = detA / traceA
for j, i in np.argwhere(harmonic_mean > thresh):
    cv2.circle(img, (i,j), 1, (0, 0, 255), -1, 8)

这篇关于加快Numpy数组/ OpenCV cv2映像的迭代速度的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆