为什么不能将类定义为受保护的？ [英] Why can a class not be defined as protected?

问题描述

我知道这是一个愚蠢的问题，但我仍有疑问需要清除。

我的问题是，为什么我们不能将类定义为 protected ？

我知道我们不能，但为什么？应该有一些特定的原因。

解决方案

因为没有意义。

受保护的类成员（方法或变量）就像package-private（默认可见性），除了它也可以从子类访问。

因为没有'subpackage'或'这样的概念Java中的package-inheritance'，声明class protected或package-private是相同的。

你可以将嵌套和内部类声明为protected或private。 / p>

I know this is a stupid question, but I still have a doubt which needs to be cleared.

My question is, why can we not define a class as protected?

I know that we can't, but why? There should be some specific reason.

解决方案

Because it makes no sense.

Protected class member (method or variable) is just like package-private (default visibility), except that it also can be accessed from subclasses.
Since there's no such concept as 'subpackage' or 'package-inheritance' in Java, declaring class protected or package-private would be the same thing.

You can declare nested and inner classes as protected or private, though.

这篇关于为什么不能将类定义为受保护的？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！