注释对proguard没有影响 [英] annotations having no effect in proguard
问题描述
根据他们的注释(在Android下),我很难找到保存内容的程序。
I'm having troubles getting proguard to keep things based on their annotations (under Android).
我有一个注释,com.example.Keep:
I have an annotation, com.example.Keep:
@Target({ ElementType.TYPE, ElementType.FIELD, ElementType.METHOD, ElementType.CONSTRUCTOR })
public @interface Keep {
}
我有一个类,它只能通过反射构建:
I have a class, which is only ever constructed through reflection:
public class Bar extends Foo {
@com.example.Keep
Bar(String a, String b) { super(a, b); }
//...
}
它有效正如预期的那样(类保留其构造函数,尽管有一个模糊的类名)当我的proguard配置包含以下内容时:
It works as expected (class keeps its constructor albeit with an obfuscated class name) When my proguard config includes the following:
-keepattributes Signature,*Annotation*,SourceFile,LineNumberTable
-keepclassmembers class ** extends com.example.Bar {
<init>(...);
}
如果我尝试将其更改为:
It drops the constructor if I try change that to:
-keepattributes Signature,*Annotation*,SourceFile,LineNumberTable
-keepclassmembers class ** extends com.example.Bar {
@com.example.Keep <init>(...);
}
我在自己的注释和proguard的annotation.jar注释中看到了相同的行为。我已经复制并粘贴了Foo导入的 Keep
中的注释名称,所以我相信它不是拼写错误或导入错误。
I see the same behaviour with both my own annotations and proguard's annotation.jar annotations. I've copied and pasted the annotation name from Foo's import of Keep
, so am confident it's not a typo or incorrect import.
有人能想到我可能缺少的东西吗?
Can anyone think of what I might be missing?
推荐答案
如果您的注释正在作为程序代码处理,应明确保留它们:
If your annotations are being processed as program code, you should explicitly preserve them:
-keep,allowobfuscation @interface *
原因有点技术性:ProGuard可能会在缩小步骤中删除它们,因此它们在优化步骤和混淆步骤中不再有效。
The reason is somewhat technical: ProGuard may remove them in the shrinking step, so they are no longer effective in the optimization step and the obfuscation step.
Cfr。 ProGuard手册>故障排除> 不保留课程或班级成员。
Cfr. ProGuard manual > Troubleshooting > Classes or class members not being kept.
这篇关于注释对proguard没有影响的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!