Java SMPP库比较 [英] Java SMPP library comparison

问题描述

我们即将开始一个需要使用SMPP作为主要集成交换渠道的项目。既然SMS不一定是我们业务的核心，我想使用一个最简单的Java的SMPP库。除了使用实际的协议之外，我们不太可能需要更高级的能力或者在引擎盖下进行调整。

We're about to begin a project which requires the use of SMPP as the primary integration exchange channel. Now since SMS isn't necessarily core to our business, I'd like to use an SMPP library for Java that will be the least hassle. Aside from riding on the actual protocol, its unlikely we'll need fancier abilities or to ever tweak under the hood.

为此，我已将一些我们可能有的选择：

To that end, I've shortlisted some of the possible options that we have:

• Logica的Open SMPP


• Apache的Camel


• JSMPP


• Twitter的Cloudhopper

• Logica's Open SMPP
• Apache's Camel
• JSMPP
• Twitter's Cloudhopper

可以在使用方面更有经验的人以我的方式投入他们的一些经验？

Can someone who's more experienced in their uses throw some of their experiences my way ?

编辑：只是为了给用例提供范围，我们将发送和接收短信，所以图书馆应该有希望使用客户端操作和服务器侦听器实现使生活变得轻松。

Just to give scope to the use cases, we'll be both sending and receiving SMS'es so the library should hopefully make life easy with both client action and also server listener implementation.

推荐答案

我已经使用了两者 jsmpp & cloudhopper-smpp 用于涉及在涉及的情况下发送和接收SMS smpp的单独项目：

I have used both jsmpp & cloudhopper-smpp for separate projects which involved sending and receiving SMS's over smpp in circumstances which involved:

• 接收中等数量的MO。


• 发送大量MT（最多70个/秒） 。

两个库都表现良好，IMO jsmpp更方便用户加入并立即开始编码。但是我在使用github的最新版本时遇到了一些错误，但仍然没有修复。

Both the libraries fared well, and IMO jsmpp is more user-friendly to jump in and start coding right away. But i had came across a few bugs while using the latest version from github, which still remain unfixed.

在使用cloudhopper后，我认为学习曲线非常值得，与jsmpp（主观）相比，它有点陡峭。

After having used cloudhopper, i reckon it is well worth the learning curve, which is a wee bit steep compared to jsmpp(subjective).

这篇关于Java SMPP库比较的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！