哪种Java Web框架最适合Web设计人员？ [英] Which Java web framework best accommodates web designers?

问题描述

哪个Java Web框架最能支持Web UI设计器角色？也就是说，哪个框架可以让您：

Which Java web framework best supports the "web UI designer" role? That is, which framework lets you:

• 在您的视图中使用流行的网页设计工具（XHTML验证器，CSS编辑器和& c。） / pages


• 查看更改而不在服务器上运行


• 快速原型化不同的UI选项


• 支持a（有点）开发人员和设计师之间的清晰分离（术语故意含糊不清）

• Use popular web design tools (XHTML validators, CSS editors, &c.) on your views/pages
• View changes without running on a server
• Rapidly prototype different UI options
• Supports a (somewhat) clean separation between "developer" and "designer" (terminology intentionally vague)

我和许多其他人一样，发现了这些功能我使用大量JSP片段和包含的大型遗留Struts 1.x应用程序非常缺乏。

I, like many others, have found these capabilities sorely lacking in my large, legacy Struts 1.x apps that use lots of JSP fragments and includes.

我决定将我的应用程序移植到JSR-168 / 268门户环境，但尚未确定哪些Java Web框架将为portlet提供支持。我对任何形式都开放（基于行动，基于组件等），关键标准是它如何支持上述角色。

I've decided to port my apps to a JSR-168/268 portal environment, but have not decided on what Java web framework will power the portlets. I'm open to any kind (action-based, component-based, etc) and a key criterion is how well it supports the role described above.

我是Tapestry很感兴趣，它声称它的视图是符合XHTML标准的页面（它只是添加了额外的Tapestry特定属性，以便在运行时进行处理）。这个声音就像它可以很好地与Web UI设计师的工具包一起使用。但是，我想知道这是否是实际在现实世界中发生的事情，或者是否需要妥协。

I'm intrigued by Tapestry, which claims that its views are XHTML-compliant pages (that simply have extra Tapestry-specific attributes added onto them to be processed at runtime). This sounds like it would play well with a web UI designer's toolkit. However, I'd like to know if this is what actually happens in the real world, or if compromises are necessary.

当然，如果有比Tapestry更好的东西，我很想听听它！

Of course, if there's something much better than Tapestry, I'd love to hear about it!

推荐答案

尝试 Wicket 。它拥有您所需要的一切。

Try Wicket. It has all you need.

这篇关于哪种Java Web框架最适合Web设计人员？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！