如何正确地对这个 HList 进行类型注释? [英] How to correctly type-annotate this HList?
问题描述
sealed abstract trait HList
case class :+:[H, T <: HList](head: H, tail: T) extends HList {
def :+:[T](v: T) = new :+:(v, this)
}
case object HNil extends HList {
def :+:[T](v: T) = new :+:(v, this)
}
object HListExpt {
def main(args: Array[String]) {
val me: String :+: Int :+: Symbol :+: HNil.type = "Rahul" :+: 20 :+: 'Male :+: HNil
println(me.head, me.tail.head)
}
}
在尝试编译上述代码时,我收到以下编译器错误:
On trying to compile the above code, I get the following compiler error:
error: type mismatch;
found : :+:[java.lang.String,:+:[Int,:+:[Symbol,object HNil]]]
required: :+:[String,:+:[Int,:+:[Symbol,HNil.type]]]
val me: String :+: Int :+: Symbol :+: HNil.type = "Rahul" :+: 20 :+: 'Male :+: HNil
我在这里做错了什么?对上述 HList
进行类型注释的正确方法是什么?
What am I doing wrong here? What would be the correct way to type-annotate the above HList
?
PS:当我删除类型注释时,代码编译得很好.
PS: The code compiles fine when I remove the type annotation.
推荐答案
这里的根本问题是从不推断单例类型.这是一个演示:
The root problem here is that singleton types are never inferred. Here's a demonstration:
scala> case object A
defined module A
scala> A
res6: A.type = A
scala> identity[A.type](A)
res7: A.type = A
scala> identity(A)
res8: object A = A
这是为什么?Quoth Odersky 等.阿尔.在 Scala 编程中,第 27.6 节:
Why is this? Quoth Odersky et. al. in Programming in Scala, §27.6:
通常 [singleton] 类型也是具体是有用的,这就是为什么编译器不愿意插入自动.
Usually [singleton] types are too specific to be useful, which is why the compiler is reluctant to insert them automatically.
所以,让我们明确提供类型参数:
So, let's explicitly provide the type argument:
sealed abstract trait HList
case class :+:[H, T <: HList](head: H, tail: T) extends HList {
def :+:[T](v: T) = new :+:(v, this)
}
case object HNil extends HList {
def :+:[T](v: T) = new :+:[T, HNil.type](v, this)
}
val me: String :+: Int :+: Symbol :+: HNil.type = "Rahul" :+: 20 :+: 'Male :+: HNil
println(me.head, me.tail.head)
奖励链接:
这篇关于如何正确地对这个 HList 进行类型注释?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!