我应该使用 boost::ptr_vector<T>或向量<boost::shared_ptr<T>>? [英] Should I use boost::ptr_vector<T> or vector<boost::shared_ptr<T> >?

查看:30
本文介绍了我应该使用 boost::ptr_vector<T>或向量<boost::shared_ptr<T>>?的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

I need a container of pointers. Would you recommend boost::ptr_vector<T> or std::vector<boost::shared_ptr<T> >? (Or something else?)

If that's of interest, my actual data structure is relatively complicated (see here) and currently stores objects, not pointers, but i'd like to change that (using pointer containers), in order to get rid of unnecessary copying:

typedef std::multimap<Foo0, std::map<int, double> > VecElem;
std::vector<VecElem> vec;

解决方案

Who owns the object? If the container owns the objects (meaning the objects should not live longer than the container), use a ptr_vector. Otherwise, use a vector of shared_ptrs. Standard library containers (such as std::vector or std::list) own the objects they contain, so the semantics of a ptr_vector is closer to that.

这篇关于我应该使用 boost::ptr_vector&lt;T&gt;或向量&lt;boost::shared_ptr&lt;T&gt;&gt;?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
相关文章
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆