杰克逊Gson [英] Jackson Vs. Gson

问题描述

在通过一些现有的库搜索JSON之后，我终于得到了这两个：

• Jackson


• Google GSon

我对GSON有点偏爱，但网络上的字词是GSon天文性能问题（截至2009年9月）。 p>

我继续我的比较;

解决方案

我在上周做了这项研究，我最终与同样的2个图书馆。由于我使用的是Spring 3（它在默认的Json视图中采用了Jackson）。 JacksonJsonView '），我更自然的做同样的事情。 2 lib几乎是一样的...最后，他们只是映射到一个json文件！ :)

无论如何，你说杰克逊的表现非常出色，对我来说非常重要。该项目也很活跃，你可以从他们的网页看到，这是一个很好的迹象。

After searching through some existing libraries for JSON, I have finally ended up with these two:

• Jackson
• Google GSon

I am a bit partial towards GSON, but word on the net is that GSon suffers from a certain celestial performance issue (as of Sept 2009).

I am continuing my comparison; in the meantime, I'm looking for help to make up my mind.

解决方案

I did this research the last week and I ended up with the same 2 libraries. As I'm using Spring 3 (that adopts Jackson in its default Json view 'JacksonJsonView') it was more natural for me to do the same. The 2 lib are pretty much the same... at the end they simply map to a json file! :)

Anyway as you said Jackson has a + in performance and that's very important for me. The project is also quite active as you can see from their web page and that's a very good sign as well.

这篇关于杰克逊Gson的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！