git add。 vs git commit -a [英] git add . vs git commit -a

问题描述

有什么区别：

• git add。


• git commit -a

或者是多余的？

意味着几乎与 git add -u&& amp;& git commit 。

它与 git add。不一样，因为它会添加未被忽略的文件不会被忽略， git add -u 只对已跟踪的文件进行更改（包括删除）。

[*]如果您不在存储库的根目录下，则会有细微差别。 git add -u 更新当前目录及其下的文件，它相当于 git add -u。而 git commit -a 阶段并将更改提交到所有跟踪文件。

What's the difference between:

• git add .
• git commit -a

Should I be doing both, or is that redundant?

解决方案

git commit -a means almost[*] the same thing as git add -u && git commit.

It's not the same as git add . as this would add untracked files that aren't being ignored, git add -u only stages changes (including deletions) to already tracked files.

[*] There's a subtle difference if you're not at the root directory of your repository. git add -u stages updates to files in the current directory and below, it's equivalent to git add -u . whereas git commit -a stages and commits changes to all tracked files.

这篇关于git add。 vs git commit -a的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！