我的MySQL获得了吗？ [英] Is my MySQL Gaining ?

问题描述

亲爱的，


他们最近关于MySQL的一些关于java功能的东西很痛苦

现在他们还有一个
http://www.mysql.com/doc /en/News-5.0.x.html


这是否与任何人有关。


我认为PostgreSQL会有什么现在更少USP'（Uniqe Selling Points

虽然我们不卖）。


你认为是的，我们PostgreSQL用户需要一些内省。 />

问候，

Vishal Kashyap。


--------------- ------------（广播结束）---------------------------

提示5：您是否检查了我们广泛的常见问题解答？

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html

Dear all,

Their was a huge rore about MySQL recently for something in java functions
now theirs one more

http://www.mysql.com/doc/en/News-5.0.x.html

Does this concern anyone.

What I think is PostgreSQL would have less USP''s (Uniqe Selling Points
though we dont sell) now.

What do you think yes we PostgreSQL users need some introspection.

Regards,
Vishal Kashyap.

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html

推荐答案

El Vie 26 Dic 2003 11:09，Sai Hertz和Contro l系统escribió：

El Vie 26 Dic 2003 11:09, Sai Hertz And Control Systems escribió:

亲爱的所有人，

他们最近关于MySQL的一些关于java函数的东西很多
现在他们还有一个

/> http://www.mysql.com/ doc / en / News-5.0.x.html

这是否与任何人有关。

我认为PostgreSQL会减少USP'（Uniqe）现在卖点
虽然我们不卖。

你认为是的，我们PostgreSQL用户需要一些内省。

Dear all,

Their was a huge rore about MySQL recently for something in java functions
now theirs one more

http://www.mysql.com/doc/en/News-5.0.x.html

Does this concern anyone.

What I think is PostgreSQL would have less USP''s (Uniqe Selling Points
though we dont sell) now.

What do you think yes we PostgreSQL users need some introspection.

1 ）这是在5.0.0开发树中，它可以出来.....

可以说比较2年？

2）具有这些功能的存储过程很久以前已经在PG了，并且

每个新版本都会得到优化。


-

select''mmarques ''|| '''''|| ''unl.edu.ar''AS电子邮件;

------------------------------ -----------------------------------
$ b $bMartínMarqués| mm******@unl.edu.ar

Programador，Administrador ，DBA | CentrodeTelemática

Universidad Nacional

del Litoral

------------------- ----------------------------------------------

---------------------------（播出结束）-------------- -------------

提示3：如果通过Usenet发布/阅读，请发送适当的

subscribe-nomail命令给 ma ******* @ postgresql.org 以便您的

消息可以通过干净地到邮件清单

1) This is in the 5.0.0 development tree, which could come out around.....
lets say 2 years maybe?
2) Stored Procedures with those features are already in PG long time ago, and
are getting optimized every new release.

--
select ''mmarques'' || ''@'' || ''unl.edu.ar'' AS email;
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Martín Marqués | mm******@unl.edu.ar
Programador, Administrador, DBA | Centro de Telemática
Universidad Nacional
del Litoral
-----------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to ma*******@postgresql.org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Martin Marques写道：

Martin Marques wrote:

El Vie 26 Dic 2003 11:09，Sai Hertz And Control Systems escribió：

El Vie 26 Dic 2003 11:09, Sai Hertz And Control Systems escribió:

他们最近因为java函数中的某些内容而成了一个关于MySQL的巨大琐事
现在他们还有一个
http://www.mysql.com/doc/en/News-5.0.x.html 我认为是PostgreSQL w现在应该有更少的USP'（Uniqe Selling Points
虽然我们不卖）。
你认为是的，我们PostgreSQL用户需要一些内省。

Their was a huge rore about MySQL recently for something in java functions
now theirs one more
http://www.mysql.com/doc/en/News-5.0.x.html
Does this concern anyone.
What I think is PostgreSQL would have less USP''s (Uniqe Selling Points
though we dont sell) now.
What do you think yes we PostgreSQL users need some introspection.

1）这是在5.0.0开发树中，它可能会出现.....
我们可以说2年？
2）具有这些功能的存储过程已经在PG很久以前了，并且

1) This is in the 5.0.0 development tree, which could come out around.....
lets say 2 years maybe?
2) Stored Procedures with those features are already in PG long time ago, and
are getting optimized every new release.

好​​吧，让我们巩固几点，以便为我们节省一些能源。


1.作为一个开源项目，竞争对postgresql没有威胁。如果mysql是

获得，那对那个社区来说很好。


2. Mysql还有很长的路要走与postgresql相提并论。差异是已知的，并且记录在案。同时postgresql项目将继续修复

错误，添加功能并尝试在每个下一个版本中做得更好。当然，

这是照常营业。


3.如果mysql适合你并且是最好的工具，请使用它。但是不要
忘记每年至少评估一次最新的postgresql版本。


我认为这涵盖了大部分可以提出的明智点在这样的讨论中......怎么说？


Shridhar



---- -----------------------（播出结束）---------------------- -----

提示9：如果您的

加入列的数据类型不匹配，计划员将忽略您选择索引扫描的愿望

Well, let''s consolidate few points so as to save us some energy.

1. As a open source project, competition is no threat to postgresql. If mysql is
gaining, fine for that that community.

2. Mysql has long way to go to be on par with postgresql. The differences are
known and wildly documented. Meanwhile postgresql project will continue to fix
bugs, add features and attempt to be better with every next release. Of course,
this is business as usual.

3. If mysql works for you and is the best tool for the job, use it. but don''t
forget to evaluate latest postgresql release at least once an year.

I think that covers most of the sensible points that can come up in such a
discussion..What say?

Shridhar


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
joining column''s datatypes do not match

在使用MySQL和Postgresql之后，有一件事是人们忽略了所有关于MySQL新功能的喧嚣。我发现的一个影响我的客户并帮助他们决定转移到Postgresql。

在OLD MySQL数据库上使用新功能时，大部分时间这意味着

a主要的转变。你不能使用旧的MyISAM。表，你必须添加

新功能，使用他们新的Innodb表结构，并写下所有的东西

无论如何。在表中添加重新设计，并且最初没有发生规范化，并且关于数据库的决定成为商业决策，而不是政治论证。我在那一点上的论点是，Postgresql被设计为

做那些事情，它们不是''添加功能''。他们是MySQL新手和

，因为你还是要重写...


到目前为止，客户选择了Postgresql。他们中的许多人对于缺乏MySQL功能而感到沮丧，并且只是为了正确的原因而准备好了。

的原因。 MySQL非常适合简单，快速的列表管理器，但是一旦你启动了需要约束，函数或任何其他普通数据库的
就可以了。

分崩离析。我认为Postgresql团队做得很好，他们专注于
Postgresql，而不是MySQL可能做的事情。


我说保持良好的工作！ />
-

Ken Harris

高级顾问
http://www.lhinfo.com

[phone]


引用Martin Marques < ma **** @ bugs.unl.edu.ar>：

Having worked with both MySQL and Postgresql, there is one thing that most
people overlook with all the hoopla about new features in MySQL. One that I
find impacts my clients and helps with their decision to move to Postgresql.
When using the new features on OLD MySQL databases, most of the time this means
a major coversion. You can''t use the old "MyISAM" tables, you have to add the
new features, use their new Innodb table structure, and write all the stuff
anyway. Add in the table redesign, and normalization that didn''t happen
originally and the decision about the database becomes a business decision, not
a political argumen. My argument at that point is, "Postgresql was designed to
do those things, they are not ''added features''. They are new to MySQL and
since you have to re-write anyway..."

So far, the clients have chosen Postgresql. Many of them are frustrated with
the lack of features in MySQL and simply are ready to move for the right
reasons. MySQL is great for a simple, fast, list manager, but once you start
needing constraints, functions, or any other ''normal'' database features it
falls apart. I think the Postgresql team is doing well, they focus on
Postgresql, not what MySQL might do.

I say keep up the good work!
--
Ken Harris
Senior Consultant
http://www.lhinfo.com
[phone]

Quoting Martin Marques <ma****@bugs.unl.edu.ar>:

El Vie 26 Dic 2003 11:09，Sai Hertz And ControlSystemsescribió：

El Vie 26 Dic 2003 11:09, Sai Hertz And Control Systems escribió:

亲爱的，

他们最近关于MySQL的一些关于java函数的东西很痛苦现在还有一个

http://www.mysql.com/doc/en/News-5.0.x .html

这是否与任何人有关。

我认为PostgreSQL会减少USP'（Uniqe卖点
虽然我们不这样做现在。

你是什么？是的，我们PostgreSQL用户需要一些内省。

Dear all,

Their was a huge rore about MySQL recently for something in java functions
now theirs one more

http://www.mysql.com/doc/en/News-5.0.x.html

Does this concern anyone.

What I think is PostgreSQL would have less USP''s (Uniqe Selling Points
though we dont sell) now.

What do you think yes we PostgreSQL users need some introspection.

1）这是在5.0.0开发树中，它可以出来.....
让我们说2可能是几年？
2）这些功能的存储程序很久以前就已经在PG中了，并且每个新版本都会对其进行优化。

-
选择''mmarques''|| '''''|| ''unl.edu.ar''AS电子邮件;
---------------------------------- -------------------------------
MartínMarqués| mm******@unl.edu.ar
Programador，Administrador，DBA | CentrodeTelemática
Universidad Nacional
del Litoral
------------------------------- ----------------------------------

-------- -------------------（广播结束）-------------------------- -
提示3：如果通过Usenet发布/阅读，请发送适当的
subscribe-nomail命令到 ma *******@postgresql.org 以便您的消息可以干净地通过邮件列表

1) This is in the 5.0.0 development tree, which could come out around.....
lets say 2 years maybe?
2) Stored Procedures with those features are already in PG long time ago, and

are getting optimized every new release.

--
select ''mmarques'' || ''@'' || ''unl.edu.ar'' AS email;
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Martín Marqués | mm******@unl.edu.ar
Programador, Administrador, DBA | Centro de Telemática
Universidad Nacional
del Litoral
-----------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to ma*******@postgresql.org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

------- ------------------------------------------

此邮件通过IMP发送： http://horde.org/imp/


---------------------------（广播结束）--------- ------------------

提示3：如果通过Usenet发布/阅读，请发送适当的

订阅 - nomail命令 ma ****** *@postgresql.org ，以便您的

消息可以干净地通过邮件列表

-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to ma*******@postgresql.org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

这篇关于我的MySQL获得了吗？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！