“小C ++”任何人? [英] "Small C++" Anyone?

查看:77
本文介绍了“小C ++”任何人?的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

(comp.lang.c ++中的C ++ Grammer线程。版主提示这篇文章)。


如果C ++很多,那将会更好一点;清洁" (更少

复杂)所以创建一个工具链

对于它来说并不是一个全世界的重大事件。回来的时候,曾经有一种叫做小C的东西。我想知道

如果这个创建者想要创建一个漂亮的小的

小C ++编译器没有C ++语言特性使得工具链

(包括编译器)实现的噩梦(?)。是的,我意识到

将是一个子集或方言 C ++。或不!他们可以称之为

其他东西,并避免所有的使用所有的C ++所有

时间支持者。如果我还有100年的生活,我会尝试解决这个问题。唉,我不是这样的,我必须专注于我能以更高的使用水平生产的东西,而不是潜入新的低水平的东西。

Anew干净的小语言完全是C ++的一个子集,但是很容易实现和创建工具链。那是

票!可能是这样的让C ++破产吗?


John

(The "C++ Grammer" thread in comp.lang.c++.moderated prompted this post).

It would be more than a little bit nice if C++ was much "cleaner" (less
complex) so that it wasn''t a major world wide untaking to create a toolchain
for it. Way back when, there used to be something called "Small C". I wonder
if the creator(s) of that would want to embark on creating a nice little
Small C++ compiler devoid of C++ language features that make toolchain
(including the compiler) a nightmare to implement (?). Yes, I realize that
would be a subset or a "dialect" of C++. Or not! They could call it
something else and avoid all the flak from the "use all of C++ all of the
time" proponents. I''d try and tackle that myself if I had another 100 years
to live. Alas, I don''t so I have to stay focused on what I can produce at a
higher level of usage instead of diving into something new and so low level.

A "new" clean "little" language that is wholly a subset of C++ but is
tremendously easier to implement and to create a toolchain for. That''s the
ticket! Could something like that "put C++ out of business"?

John

推荐答案

JohnQ写道:
JohnQ wrote:

(comp.lang.c ++中的C ++ Grammer线程。版主提示这篇文章)。


它如果C ++更清洁,那将会更好一点。 (更少

复杂)所以创建一个工具链

对于它来说并不是一个全世界的重大事件。回来的时候,曾经有一种叫做小C的东西。我想知道

如果这个创建者想要创建一个漂亮的小的

小C ++编译器没有C ++语言特性使得工具链

(包括编译器)实现的噩梦(?)。是的,我意识到

将是一个子集或方言 C ++。或不!他们可以称之为

其他东西,并避免所有的使用所有的C ++所有

时间支持者。如果我还有100年的生活,我会尝试解决这个问题。唉,我不是这样的,我必须专注于我能以更高的使用水平生产的东西,而不是潜入新的低水平的东西。

Anew干净的小语言完全是C ++的一个子集,但是很容易实现和创建工具链。那是

票!可能是这样的把C ++搞砸了?
(The "C++ Grammer" thread in comp.lang.c++.moderated prompted this post).

It would be more than a little bit nice if C++ was much "cleaner" (less
complex) so that it wasn''t a major world wide untaking to create a toolchain
for it. Way back when, there used to be something called "Small C". I wonder
if the creator(s) of that would want to embark on creating a nice little
Small C++ compiler devoid of C++ language features that make toolchain
(including the compiler) a nightmare to implement (?). Yes, I realize that
would be a subset or a "dialect" of C++. Or not! They could call it
something else and avoid all the flak from the "use all of C++ all of the
time" proponents. I''d try and tackle that myself if I had another 100 years
to live. Alas, I don''t so I have to stay focused on what I can produce at a
higher level of usage instead of diving into something new and so low level.

A "new" clean "little" language that is wholly a subset of C++ but is
tremendously easier to implement and to create a toolchain for. That''s the
ticket! Could something like that "put C++ out of business"?



这听起来有点像回到原来的cfront之一

编译器,或者EC ++?


-

Ian Collins。

That sounds a bit like going back to one of the original cfront
compilers, or maybe EC++?

--
Ian Collins.


JohnQ写道:
JohnQ wrote:

A" new"干净的小语言完全是C ++的一个子集,但是很容易实现和创建工具链。那是

票!可能是这样的让C ++退出业务?


John
A "new" clean "little" language that is wholly a subset of C++ but is
tremendously easier to implement and to create a toolchain for. That''s the
ticket! Could something like that "put C++ out of business"?

John



不是一个特别新的讨论。这是一个简化的想法。 C ++

称为EC ++:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embedded_C%2B%2B


我必须在这里同意Stroustrup。以下是其他一些选择

我建议你研究一下:


a)Scala(如果你是一个Java人)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scala_%...ng_language%29

b)D(如果你喜欢C ++)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D_programming_language


BTW,你确定可以在这个上发布这样的东西吗? />
新闻组?

Not a particularly new discussion. Here is an idea to "simplify" C++
called EC++:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embedded_C%2B%2B

I''d have to agree with Stroustrup here. Here are some other alternatives
I could suggest you look into:

a) Scala (if you are a Java man)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scala_%...ng_language%29
b) D (if you like C++)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D_programming_language

BTW, Are you sure it is alright to post things like this on this
newsgroup?


" JohnQ" < jo *********************** @ yahoo.com写了留言

新闻:AQ ******* *********@newssvr23.news.prodigy.net ...
"JohnQ" <jo***********************@yahoo.comwrote in message
news:AQ****************@newssvr23.news.prodigy.net ...

(comp.lang.c ++中的C ++ Grammer线程.moderated提示这篇文章)。


如果C ++很干净,那将会有点好看。 (更少

复杂)因此创建一个
(The "C++ Grammer" thread in comp.lang.c++.moderated prompted this post).

It would be more than a little bit nice if C++ was much "cleaner" (less
complex) so that it wasn''t a major world wide untaking to create a



工具链

toolchain


。回来的时候,曾经有一种叫做小C的东西。我
for it. Way back when, there used to be something called "Small C". I



想知道

wonder


如果其中的创造者想要开始创造一个好的很少

小型C ++编译器缺乏C ++语言特性,这些特性使得工具链(包括编译器)实现了一个噩梦(?)。是的,我意识到

将是一个子集或方言 C ++。或不!他们可以称之为

其他东西,并避免所有的使用所有的C ++所有

时间支持者。如果我有另外100美元b $ b
if the creator(s) of that would want to embark on creating a nice little
Small C++ compiler devoid of C++ language features that make toolchain
(including the compiler) a nightmare to implement (?). Yes, I realize that
would be a subset or a "dialect" of C++. Or not! They could call it
something else and avoid all the flak from the "use all of C++ all of the
time" proponents. I''d try and tackle that myself if I had another 100




years


生活,我会尝试解决这个问题。唉,我不是这样,我必须专注于我能以
生产的东西
to live. Alas, I don''t so I have to stay focused on what I can produce at



a

a


更高的使用水平,而不是潜入新的低价
higher level of usage instead of diving into something new and so low



等级。

level.


>

Anew干净的小语言完全是C ++的一个子集,但是很容易实现和创建工具链。那是

票!可能是这样的让C ++破产吗?
>
A "new" clean "little" language that is wholly a subset of C++ but is
tremendously easier to implement and to create a toolchain for. That''s the
ticket! Could something like that "put C++ out of business"?



我认为使C ++难以实现的东西(例如模板,

命名空间)最终会被请求或添加到"小-C ++"结束

时间。


丹尼斯

I think the very things that make C++ hard to implement (e.g. templates,
namespaces) would wind up being requested or added to the "Small-C++" over
time.

Dennis


这篇关于“小C ++”任何人?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆