Python使用非开源的bug跟踪器？ [英] Python to use a non open source bug tracker?
问题描述
你好，
我刚读过Brett Cannon的这封邮件：
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pyt...er/069139.html
其中PSF基础设施委员会，经过数周的评估后，建议使用非开源追踪器（称为JIRA - 当然从未听过）的b $ b
对于Python本身。
这闻到了Bitkeeper惨败吗？给我以外的任何人？
-
Giovanni Bajo
Giovanni Bajo写道：
您好，
我刚读过Brett Cannon的这封邮件：
http：//mail.python.org/pipermail/pyt ... er / 069139.html
其中PSF基础设施委员会，经过数周的评估，建议使用非开源跟踪器（称为JIRA - ）
当然没有听说过）
for Python本身。
这闻到了Bitkeeper惨败吗？对我以外的任何人？
No.
-
Robert Kern
我已经开始相信整个世界都是一个谜，一个无害的谜团
由于我们疯狂地试图解释它而使它变得可怕，好像它有了
一个潜在的事实。
- Umberto Eco
Giovanni Bajo写道：
< blockquote class =post_quotes>
我刚读过Brett Cannon的这封邮件：
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pyt...er/069139.html
其中 PSF基础设施委员会，经过数周的评估，建议使用非开源跟踪器（称为JIRA - 当然从未听过）来获取
用于Python本身的
。 />
这闻到了Bitkeeper惨败吗？对我以外的任何人？
不一定（对
要求清单中的数据导出有很好的支持），但对于我们这些人来说一直在关注
委员会的工作，确实有一个令人不安的数额
免费，因为 - 哦闪亮！从一开始。
但请注意，委员会确实意识到使用Python-
驱动的Python工具本身就是一件好事;他们要求可以保持综合实例运行的志愿者获得
，并修复
出现的任何问题。 python.org有很多硬件，但没有足够的人力去做所有可以完成的工作。详见布雷特的
帖子。
< / F>
" Giovanni Bajo" < no *** @ sorry.comwrites：
我刚读过Brett Cannon的这封邮件：
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pyt...er/069139。 html
其中PSF基础设施委员会，经过数周的评估后，
建议使用非开源跟踪器（称为JIRA - 从不
当然听说过Python本身。
这闻到了Bitkeeper惨败吗？对我以外的任何人？
听起来很疯狂，bugzilla有什么问题？
Hello,
I just read this mail by Brett Cannon:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pyt...er/069139.html
where the "PSF infrastracture committee", after weeks of evaluation, recommends
using a non open source tracker (called JIRA - never heard before of course)
for Python itself.
Does this smell "Bitkeeper fiasco" to anyone else than me?
--
Giovanni Bajo
Giovanni Bajo wrote:Hello,
I just read this mail by Brett Cannon:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pyt...er/069139.html
where the "PSF infrastracture committee", after weeks of evaluation, recommends
using a non open source tracker (called JIRA - never heard before of course)
for Python itself.
Does this smell "Bitkeeper fiasco" to anyone else than me?No.
--
Robert Kern
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma
that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had
an underlying truth."
-- Umberto Eco
Giovanni Bajo wrote:
I just read this mail by Brett Cannon:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pyt...er/069139.html
where the "PSF infrastracture committee", after weeks of evaluation, recommends
using a non open source tracker (called JIRA - never heard before of course)
for Python itself.
Does this smell "Bitkeeper fiasco" to anyone else than me?not necessarily (and good support for data export is high on the
requirements list), but for those of us who''s been following the
committee''s work, there has indeed been a disturbing amount of
"free as in - oh shiny!" from the very beginning.
however, note that the committee do realize that using a Python-
powered tool for Python is a good thing in itself; they are asking
for volunteers that can keep a roundup instance running, and fix
any issues that arises. python.org has plenty of hardware, but not
enough manpower to do everything that could be done. see brett''s
post for details.
</F>
"Giovanni Bajo" <no***@sorry.comwrites:I just read this mail by Brett Cannon:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pyt...er/069139.html
where the "PSF infrastracture committee", after weeks of evaluation,
recommends using a non open source tracker (called JIRA - never
heard before of course) for Python itself.
Does this smell "Bitkeeper fiasco" to anyone else than me?Sounds crazy, what''s wrong with bugzilla?
这篇关于Python使用非开源的bug跟踪器？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
