关于CLC的问题 [英] Question about CLC

问题描述

大家好，


我已经读了这个小组几个星期了，而且它非常好

有趣的方式'像社会那样功能失调。实际上我是在告诉我的兄弟这件事 - 他是一位社会学专业的学生，​​现在有兴趣看这个小组参与他的项目了。


多年来我读过几个Usenet小组和很多论坛，并且

，当然其中一些有巨魔，不和等等，似乎没有<这个地方性的愤怒和仇恨是CLC所做的。为了进行比较，有没有人可以推荐具有类似特征的其他

新闻组？


这很有意思，因为标准理论建议你需要

在需要规则，等级，权限

等有效运行之前，一组中有100到150人，而在CLC中只有20-30

常客，然而它在人们紧张的情况下遭受了严重的痛苦

几乎生活在一起。


我不敢问人们为什么他们这样做认为这个团体是如此激烈，因为害怕开始另一场激烈的火焰战争！


最佳。

Hi all,

I''ve been reading this group new for a few weeks and it''s quite
intriguing the way it''s so dysfunctional as a "society". Actually I was
telling my brother about it - he''s a sociology major and is now
interested in looking at this group for his project.

I''ve read several Usenet groups and lots of forums over the years, and
while of course some of them have trolls, feuds, etc., none seem to have
this endemic anger and hate that CLC does. Can anyone suggest other
newsgroups with similar characteristics for comparison purposes?

It''s quite interesting, because standard theory suggests you need about
100 to 150 people in a group before it needs rules, hierarchy, authority
etc. to function effectively, whereas in CLC there only seem to be 20-30
regulars and yet it''s suffering badly under the strain of people
virtually living together.

I don''t dare ask people why they think this group is so acrimonious, for
fear of starting yet another bitter flame war!

Best.

推荐答案

Masood说：

Masood said:

大家好，


我一直在读书这个小组几个星期以来一直是新的，并且它非常有趣，因为它像社会那样功能失调。

Hi all,

I''ve been reading this group new for a few weeks and it''s quite
intriguing the way it''s so dysfunctional as a "society".

你在乞求这个问题。事实上，它运作得很好。是的，它有它的b
kooks，但任何社会也是如此。


< snip>

You''re begging the question. In fact, it works pretty well. Yes, it has its
kooks, but so does any society.

<snip>

多年来我已经阅读了几个Usenet小组和许多论坛，并且

，当然其中一些人有巨魔，不和等等，似乎都没有

这种地方性的愤怒和仇恨是CLC所做的。

I''ve read several Usenet groups and lots of forums over the years, and
while of course some of them have trolls, feuds, etc., none seem to have
this endemic anger and hate that CLC does.

CLC也不是。在这里发帖的大多数人都是寻求帮助的人，他们 - 总的来说 - 表现得相当合理，或者人们给b
提供帮助，再次，整体 - 表现良好。如果你打算那些不属于任何类别的人（无论是帮助者还是寻求者，无论是在
帮助之后）是不相关的，那么这实际上是一个非常善良的群体。

那是因为那些吵闹，吐痰，疯狂，激烈的海报是那些需要麻烦而不是讨论或协助的人。

Neither does CLC. Most of the people who post here are either people
seeking help, who - on the whole - behave pretty reasonably, or people
giving help, who - again, on the whole - behave well. If you discount
those who fall into neither category (neither helpers nor seekers after
help) as being irrelevant, this is actually quite a good-natured group.
That''s because the noisy, spitting-mad, acrimonious posters are those who
are looking for trouble rather than discussion or assistance.

这很有意思，因为标准理论建议你在需要规则，等级，权限之前，需要在一个组中需要100到150美元。 >
等有效运作，而在CLC中，似乎只有20-30美元b $ b常客，但它在人们的压力下遭受了严重的痛苦

几乎生活在一起。

It''s quite interesting, because standard theory suggests you need about
100 to 150 people in a group before it needs rules, hierarchy, authority
etc. to function effectively, whereas in CLC there only seem to be 20-30
regulars and yet it''s suffering badly under the strain of people
virtually living together.

你高估了一小撮吵闹的影响。小组

令人钦佩地履行其职能。


-

Richard Heathfield< http://www.cpax.org .uk>

电子邮件：-http：// www。 + rjh @

谷歌用户：< http://www.cpax.org.uk/prg/writings/googly.php>

Usenet是一个奇怪的放置" - dmr 1999年7月29日

You over-estimate the impact of a small handful of noisy kooks. The group
fulfils its function admirably.

--
Richard Heathfield <http://www.cpax.org.uk>
Email: -http://www. +rjh@
Google users: <http://www.cpax.org.uk/prg/writings/googly.php>
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999

Richard Heathfield写道：

Richard Heathfield wrote:

>

你高估了一小撮吵闹的影响。该组

令人钦佩地完成了它的功能。

>
You over-estimate the impact of a small handful of noisy kooks. The group
fulfils its function admirably.

最后一个很好的答案。我希望你能停止制造那么多噪音，

并修改你的方式。每个kook都可以（并且应该）能够正常行动

。


P.S.这当然适用于其他的kooks。


-

jacob navia

jacob at jacob point remcomp point fr

logiciels / informatique
http：/ /www.cs.virginia.edu/~lcc-win32

Masood写道：

Masood wrote:

大家好，


我已经读了几个星期这个小组，而且它非常好

有趣的是它的方式像社会一样功能失调。

Hi all,

I''ve been reading this group new for a few weeks and it''s quite
intriguing the way it''s so dysfunctional as a "society".

这个新闻组是最古老，最成功的新闻组之一。当其他

新闻组已经被抛弃并放弃进入usenet

的污水池时，这个已经继续了。正是它的常规

海报的警惕性，对时事性的坚持，以及那些将它用于保留它的商业目的的人的回避。毫无疑问，只有那些你错误地解释为它的东西才能节省
功能失调。

This newsgroup is one of the oldest and most successful. While other
newsgroups have come and been thrown abandonned into the usenet
cesspool, this one has continued. It is the vigilance of its regular
posters, the insistence on topicality, the shunning of those who would
use it for their commercial ends that have preserved it. No doubt it is
saved by just those things that you mistakenly interpret as its being
dysfunctional.

实际上我是在告诉我的兄弟这件事 - 他是一名社会学专业的学生，​​现在有兴趣看这个小组参与他的项目。

Actually I was
telling my brother about it - he''s a sociology major and is now
interested in looking at this group for his project.

我希望他的分析能力超过你的。否则他将需要一个

的观众，这些观众既轻信又缺乏对b / b
主题的真正了解。

I hope his analytical abilities exceed yours. Otherwise he will need an
audience that is both gullible and that lacks all real knowledge of the
subject.

我多年来已经阅读了几个Usenet小组和许多论坛，并且

当然其中一些有巨魔，不和等等，似乎都没有

CLC的这种地方性的愤怒和仇恨。任何人都可以建议具有类似特征的其他

新闻组用于比较目的吗？

I''ve read several Usenet groups and lots of forums over the years, and
while of course some of them have trolls, feuds, etc., none seem to have
this endemic anger and hate that CLC does. Can anyone suggest other
newsgroups with similar characteristics for comparison purposes?

如果你看到愤怒和仇恨，那么你可能正在使用镜子购买
计算机屏幕。宝贵资源的保护性不是愤怒，也不是讨厌。

If you see anger and hate, then you are probably using a mirror for a
computer screen. Protectiveness of a precious resource is not anger or
hate.

这篇关于关于CLC的问题的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！