数据库市场份额2004 [英] Database market share 2004
问题描述
http://www.eweek.com /article2 / 0,1759,1820667,00.asp
数据库市场在2004年增长了10.3％，主要是因为对商业的渴望根据Gartner Group周一公布的数据，智能和分析显示了这一数据。
占整个市场的34.1％，IBM比其最接近的价格保持微弱优势。 b $ b竞争对手甲骨文公司，占整个市场的33.7％。微软
Corp.跟进20％的市场份额。 NCR Teradata Corp.控制2.9％，
Sybase Inc.声称2.3％，其他人持有6.6％。广告
根据Gartner公司的数据，市场增长数字是2003年RDBMS（关系数据管理系统（DBMS））市场增长的两倍，即5美分，即科琳·格雷厄姆（Colleen Graham），谁撰写了报告。
[增长]来自商业智能，数据仓库和数据分析，她说。 你可以
告诉你，如果你看[NCR];他们的增长非常强劲，而且他们是一个数据仓库数据库。这就是我们看到其中很多来自的地方。
市场从2003年的不到71亿美元增长到新的
$近78亿美元b $ b许可证销售。格雷厄姆表示，美元的持续疲软人为地夸大了市场在某种程度上的增长，占整体增长的3％至4％。
[整体市场增长]可能在6％到7％之间，考虑到美国境外的销售额转换为美元后，她表示
后，由于货币转换，b $ b对供应商的收入贡献更多，而不是增加< b / b
需求。
微软和Teradata在整体增长方面领先，分别为18％和17％，分别为b $ b。然而，整体市场份额并没有明显的赢家。据报告称，由于IBM和甲骨文的RDBMS收入之间的差额不到3000万美元，因此在统计上太接近宣布胜利者的价格为b / b
。不清楚
整体RDBMS市场份额竞赛的获胜者。
阅读有关Oracle的PIM数据中心的详细信息。
获胜者或没有赢家，供应商很快就指出了图片中美好的部分。
Oracle数据库产品营销高级总监Willie Hardie发现证据表明
市场正在购买数据库公司的网格愿景，以及推动在Linux平台上运行的商用服务器上的RAC（Real
Application Clusters）。
"忘掉具体的数据库并查看服务器销售情况， Hardley说，在Redwood
Shores，加利福尼亚州。服务器的增长市场是小型服务器，集中了小型的b $ b服务器。这与Oracle的网格模型非常匹配：不要购买大型服务器;集群
一起运行Linux或Windows的盒子。毫无疑问，这个行业的趋势朝着这个方向发展，这有点反映在甲骨文2004年的增长中。
Linux上的RDBMS市场同时，这是炙手可热的。虽然整个RDBMS市场仍占相对较小的一部分，但2004年Linux部门增长了118％，从2003年的3亿美元增加到超过6.5亿美元，增加了一倍多。 2004年。
Gartner发现甲骨文在这一市场中的领先优势超过IBM，其中b
增长了155％。 Oracle现在控制着80.5％的Linux RDBMS市场，高于一年前的69％。与此同时，IBM在2004年下滑，与去年市场上28.4％的市场份额相比，市场价格仅为16.5％。
Gartner报告指出Linux RDBMS收入包括Oracle 9i RAC的销售额，b / b
，除了该公司的常规RDBMS许可费之外，还增加了约50％的溢价。
Bob Picciano，副总裁IBM的数据库服务器表示，甲骨文不断增长的Linux领先优势
是由这些附加的RAC费用人为地增加的。 Oracle正在做的是，他们将他们自己的Unix基础迁移到Linux平台上，在纽约州萨默斯市的Picciano说，在
流程中，他们通过引入RAC的成本来增加这些客户的软件成本。 ;
很少有用户在没有RAC选项的情况下为Linux平台购买Oracle， Gartner
报告指出。 据估计，Linux平台上几乎有20％到30％的Oracle RAC部署在Linux平台上。
Hardie表示对Linux的需求没有减弱的迹象他说，来自几乎所有的b $ b垂直行业，包括集群RAC上的数据仓库实施 -
显然不是针对利基需求的解决方案。
IBM将与使用与RAC竞争的DB2功能进行反击。特别是，
公司发布的Stinger， DB2的下一个版本针对
Linux内核的2.6版进行了优化，此举旨在帮助数据库集群扩展更高并更快地执行
。 br />
它还旨在更好地利用依赖于多个处理器的
的64位数据库和服务器的速度。
IBM的承诺是这样的多处理器服务器可以在Linux集群中加入，就像使用DB2 ICE（集成集群环境）一样，这是一个集成DB2和
eServer Linux集群1350的集成软件包。 xSeries，325，BladeCenter）提供的解决方案，根据IBM的b $ b，可以从2到1,000台服务器进行集群，并以4个每小时的速度接收节点
小时。
Picciano还指出Stinger的HADR（高可用性和灾难恢复）是IBM能够以一小部分提供高可用性的关键Oracle的成本
RAC。
" With RAC，客户需要许可这两个盒子上的所有处理器，并且他们需要获得RAC功能的许可证，他说。 使用HADR，您需要为主要[盒子]
和备用盒上的一个处理器支付处理器费用。所以节省的成本要高得多。
Picciano说，HADR帮助IBM在IBM和微软支付b $ b的销售情况下进行了战斗。 我们赢得了89.4％的时间，我们正在与甲骨文进行互动，而且我们正在赢得微软的支持。根据2005年第一季度的数据，他说，不仅要感谢HADR，还要感谢再培训销售团队，以及决定在芯片级别为服务器定价而不是
核心级别。
微软可以预见，对Linux数据库市场的增长感到嗤之以鼻。 看看它：
它是一个小市场， SQL Server产品管理总监Tom Rizzo说。 你已经希望从这么小的基数中获得一些增长。
Rizzo指出Windows数据库市场的健康增长是Windows的证据
是在Linux阵营中吃饭而不是相反。 2004年，Windows服务器平台上的RDBMS市场增长了10％。微软的市场份额增长了18％。
这个细分市场。
点击这里阅读更多关于开源数据库不断增加的市场份额的信息
PostgreSQL。
这给微软50％的Windows RDBMS市场贡献率，高于47.4％ 2003年，这个市场细分市场下降了4％，而2003年的市场份额下降了近12％，这是Gartner因为采用DB2 8而导致的滑点。
格雷厄姆说她很惊讶地看到微软做得很好，因为发布的代号为Yukon的SQL版本已经被推迟了很久。
我们做预测并说''好的，这些供应商中的每一家都推出了新的
产品？每个人都在产品生命周期中的哪个位置？''她说。 为了看到微软有这么强劲的增长，即使在他们发布育空之前，这让我感到有趣。人们
等不及了。
微软的大部分成功可能都归功于BI的整体兴趣，格雷厄姆说 - a
前提是Rizzo借调。 BI对我们来说是一个巨大的增长动力，特别是报告
服务，我们已经看到大量客户购买和部署，他说。
这就是我们在SQL Server上投入大量BI技术的原因。我们多年前支付了一笔很低的费用，现在它已经在收入增长方面得到了回报， Rizzo补充说，
指向该公司1998年发布的OLAP（在线分析处理）服务，
这是一系列BI技术中的第一个集成到数据库本身。
人们看着我们，好像我们有点疯狂，里佐说。 [他们问道]，''为什么？
微软将BI整合到数据库中？大多数人都单独购买。''我们说。
将它无缝集成到数据库中。所有那些认为我们有四个头并且八个眼睛的人，你看看我们的竞争对手的策略，他们开始走下去了同样的道路我们几年前就开始了。
2003年的71亿到
7.8新的
许可证销售额为10亿美元。格雷厄姆表示，美元的持续疲软人为地夸大了市场在某种程度上的增长，占整体增长的3％至4％。
[整体市场增长]可能在6％到7％之间，考虑到美国境外的销售额转换为美元后，她表示
后，由于货币转换，b $ b对供应商的收入贡献更多，而不是增加< b / b
需求。
微软和Teradata在整体增长方面领先，分别为18％和17％，分别为b $ b。然而，整体市场份额并没有明显的赢家。因为IBM和Oracle的RDBMS收入之间的差异小于
3000万，所以它在统计上太接近于b / b
根据该报告称，获胜者名为不清楚
在整体RDBMS市场份额竞赛中获胜者。
在此阅读有关Oracle PIM数据中心的详细信息。
赢家或没有赢家，供应商很快指出了图片的美好部分。
Oracle数据库产品营销高级总监Willie Hardie发现证据表明，市场正在购买数据库公司的网格愿景，以及推动在Linux平台上运行的商用服务器上的RAC（Real
Application Clusters）集群。
专门忘记数据库并查看服务器销售情况， Hardley说，在Redwood
Shores，加利福尼亚州。服务器的增长市场是小型服务器，集中了小型的b $ b服务器。这与Oracle的网格模型非常匹配：不要购买大型服务器;集群
一起运行Linux或Windows的盒子。毫无疑问，这个行业的趋势朝着这个方向发展，这有点反映在甲骨文2004年的增长中。
Linux上的RDBMS市场同时，这是炙手可热的。虽然整个RDBMS市场仍占相对较小的一部分，但2004年Linux部门增长了118％，从
增加了两倍多b $ b / p>
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1820667,00.asp
The database market grew by 10.3 percent in 2004, fueled largely by hunger for business
intelligence and analytics, according to numbers released by the Gartner Group on Monday.
With 34.1 percent of the overall market, IBM holds a slim margin over its closest
competitor, Oracle Corp., which maintains 33.7 percent of the overall market. Microsoft
Corp. follows up with 20 percent of the market. NCR Teradata Corp. controls 2.9 percent,
Sybase Inc. claims 2.3 percent and others hold 6.6 percent. ADVERTISEMENT
The market growth figure doubles that of RDBMS (relational DBMS) market growth in 2003,
which was 5 percent, according to Gartner Inc.''s Colleen Graham, who authored the report.
"[The growth] came a lot from BI, data warehousing and data analysis," she said. "You can
tell that if you look at [NCR]; they had really strong growth, and they''re a
data-warehousing database. That''s where we''re seeing a lot of this come from."
The market grew from just under $7.1 billion in 2003 to nearly $7.8 billion in terms of new
license sales. The continuing weakness of the U.S. dollar artificially inflated market
growth to some degree, Graham said, accounting for some 3 to 4 percent of overall growth.
"[Overall market growth] was probably somewhere between 6 and 7 percent," she said, after
considering that sales outside of the United States, when converted to U.S. dollars,
contributed more to vendor revenue because of currency conversion, as opposed to increased
demand.
Microsoft and Teradata led in terms of overall growth, with 18 percent and 17 percent,
respectively. However, there was no clear winner in market share overall. Because the
difference between RDBMS revenue for IBM and Oracle was less than $30 million, it is
statistically too close to declare a winner, according to the report, titled "No Clear
Winner in Overall RDBMS Market Share Race."
Read details here about Oracle''s PIM Data Hub.
Winner or no winner, vendors were quick to point out the rosy parts of the picture.
Willie Hardie, Oracle''s senior director of Database Product Marketing, found evidence that
the market is buying into the database company''s grid vision and its pushing of RAC (Real
Application Clusters) clustering on commodity servers running on the Linux platform.
"Forget about databases specifically and look at server sales," said Hardie, in Redwood
Shores, Calif. "The growth market in servers is in small servers, with clustering of small
servers. That matches closely to Oracle''s grid model: don''t buy big servers; cluster
together boxes running Linux or Windows. No doubt there''s a trend in the industry moving in
that direction, somewhat reflected in Oracle''s growth in 2004."
The market for RDBMS on Linux, meanwhile, is red-hot. While still a relatively small part of
the overall RDBMS market, the Linux segment grew 118 percent in 2004, more than doubling
from $300 million in 2003 to more than $650 million in 2004.
Gartner found that Oracle has a growing lead over IBM in this subsection of the market, with
growth of 155 percent. Oracle now controls 80.5 percent of the Linux RDBMS market, up from
69 percent a year ago. IBM, meanwhile, slipped in 2004, coming to rest at 16.5 percent of
the market from year-ago figures of 28.4 percent of the market.
The Gartner report pointed out that Linux RDBMS revenue includes sales of Oracle 9i RAC,
which adds about a 50 percent premium on top of regular RDBMS license fees for that company.
Bob Picciano, vice president of database servers for IBM, said Oracle''s growing Linux lead
is artificially puffed up by those add-on RAC fees. "What Oracle is doing is, they''re
migrating their own Unix base to the Linux platform," said Picciano, in Somers, N.Y. "In the
process, they''re increasing the cost of software to those clients, by introducing the cost
of RAC."
"Few users are acquiring Oracle for the Linux platform without the RAC option," the Gartner
report states. "Almost 20 percent to 30 percent of Oracle RAC deployments are estimated to
be on the Linux platform."
Hardie said the demand for Linux shows no signs of abating, coming from virtually all the
vertical industries and including implementations of data warehousing on clustered RAC-that
clearly not being a solution for the needs of a niche, he said.
IBM is set to fight back with DB2 features that compete with RAC. In particular, the
company''s release of "Stinger," the next version of DB2, is optimized for Version 2.6 of the
Linux kernel, a move that''s geared toward helping database clusters scale higher and perform
faster.
It is also intended to better exploit the speed of 64-bit databases and servers that rely on
multiple processors.
IBM''s promise is that such multiprocessor servers can be joined in Linux clusters, as with
DB2 ICE (Integrated Cluster Environment), an integrated package that combines DB2 and
eServer Linux Cluster 1350 (xSeries, 325, BladeCenter) to provide a solution that, according
to IBM, can cluster from two to 1,000 servers and pick up nodes at the rate of four per
hour.
Picciano also pointed to Stinger''s HADR (High Availability and Disaster Recovery) as being
the key to IBM''s ability to deliver high availability at a fraction of the cost of Oracle
RAC.
"With RAC, the client needs to license all the processors on both boxes, and they need to
license the RAC feature," he said. "With HADR, you pay for processors on the primary [box]
and for one processor on the standby box. So the cost savings is much greater."
Picciano said that HADR has helped IBM do battle in sales situations where IBM and Microsoft
are in the room. "We''re winning 89.4 percent of the time we''re engaging against Oracle and
Microsoft" according to Q1 2005 numbers, he said, thanks not only to HADR but also to a
retrained sales team and the decision to price servers at the chip level rather than the
core level.
Microsoft, predictably, scoffed at the growth of the Linux database market. "Look at it:
It''s a small market," said Tom Rizzo, director of product management for SQL Server. "You''d
expect some growth there, from such a small base."
Rizzo pointed to the healthy growth in the Windows database market as evidence that Windows
is "eating away at the Linux camp" rather than the other way around. The RDBMS market on the
Windows server platform grew 10 percent in 2004. Microsoft''s market share grew 18 percent in
this segment.
Click here to read more about the increasing market share of open-source database
PostgreSQL.
That gave Microsoft 50.9 percent of the Windows RDBMS market, up from 47.4 percent in 2003.
IBM posted a 4 percent decline in this market segment, which followed a nearly 12 percent
decline in 2003-a slippage Gartner attributed to weak adoption of DB2 8.
Graham said she was surprised to see Microsoft do so well, given that the release of SQL
Server 2005, code-named Yukon, has been delayed so often and so long.
"We do our forecast and say ''OK, each of these vendors, which is coming out with a new
product? Where''s each one been in the product lifecycle?''" she said. "To see Microsoft have
growth this strong, even before they release Yukon, that struck me as interesting. People
aren''t waiting."
Much of Microsoft''s success likely goes back to the overall interest in BI, Graham said-a
premise that Rizzo seconded. "BI is a tremendous growth driver for us, especially Reporting
Services, which we''ve seen a ton of customers buying and deploying," he said.
"That''s why we invested so heavily in BI technologies across SQL Server. We put a down
payment many years ago, and now it''s paying off in terms of revenue growth," Rizzo added,
pointing to the company''s release of OLAP (online analytical processing) services in 1998,
which was the first of a string of BI technologies integrated into the database itself.
"People looked at us like we were kind of crazy," Rizzo said. "[They asked,] ''Why is
Microsoft integrating BI into the database? Most people buy it separately.'' We''re saying .
integrate it seamlessly into the database. All the people who thought we had four heads and
eight eyes, you look at the strategies of our competitors, they''re starting to go down the
same path we started down years ago."
7.1 billion in 2003 to nearly
7.8 billion in terms of new
license sales. The continuing weakness of the U.S. dollar artificially inflated market
growth to some degree, Graham said, accounting for some 3 to 4 percent of overall growth.
"[Overall market growth] was probably somewhere between 6 and 7 percent," she said, after
considering that sales outside of the United States, when converted to U.S. dollars,
contributed more to vendor revenue because of currency conversion, as opposed to increased
demand.
Microsoft and Teradata led in terms of overall growth, with 18 percent and 17 percent,
respectively. However, there was no clear winner in market share overall. Because the
difference between RDBMS revenue for IBM and Oracle was less than
30 million, it is
statistically too close to declare a winner, according to the report, titled "No Clear
Winner in Overall RDBMS Market Share Race."
Read details here about Oracle''s PIM Data Hub.
Winner or no winner, vendors were quick to point out the rosy parts of the picture.
Willie Hardie, Oracle''s senior director of Database Product Marketing, found evidence that
the market is buying into the database company''s grid vision and its pushing of RAC (Real
Application Clusters) clustering on commodity servers running on the Linux platform.
"Forget about databases specifically and look at server sales," said Hardie, in Redwood
Shores, Calif. "The growth market in servers is in small servers, with clustering of small
servers. That matches closely to Oracle''s grid model: don''t buy big servers; cluster
together boxes running Linux or Windows. No doubt there''s a trend in the industry moving in
that direction, somewhat reflected in Oracle''s growth in 2004."
The market for RDBMS on Linux, meanwhile, is red-hot. While still a relatively small part of
the overall RDBMS market, the Linux segment grew 118 percent in 2004, more than doubling
from
这篇关于数据库市场份额2004的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
