GPL Java会吞噬Python市场份额吗？ [英] Will GPL Java eat into Python marketshare?

问题描述

有些人认为它会。


直到现在，Java从未成为不同版本的标准
Linux和Unix的b $ b。有些人认为这是一些开发人员已经避免使用Java支持Python的原因之一。既然Java已经被GPL'认可了，那么
可能会改变。


IMO：它没有太大的区别。但我真的不知道。

解决方案

walterbyrd写道：
< blockquote class =post_quotes>
有些人认为它会。


直到现在，Java从未成为不同版本的标准

of Linux和Unix。有些人认为这是一些开发人员已经避免使用Java支持Python的原因之一。既然Java已经被GPL'认可了，那么
可能会改变。


IMO：它没有太大的区别。但我真的不知道。

这一变化也可能为进一步扩展

jython提供机会，进入Java市场份额

" walterbyrd" < wa ******** @ iname.comwrites：

有人认为它会。


Up直到现在，Java从未成为跨越不同版本的标准
Linux和Unix的b $ b。有些人认为这是一些开发人员已经避免使用Java支持Python的原因之一。既然Java已经被GPL'认可了，那么
可能会改变。


IMO：它没有太大的区别。但我真的不知道。

简答：人们使用Python而不是Java，因为人们（

最不聪明的人）倾向于避免痛苦。


长答案：更改许可证并没有神奇地改变Java的

架构。它仍然是一个重新发明轮子的封闭世界，

my-way-or-the-highway。这与Python'混杂的

界面与任何方法相对立。


-

Harry George

PLM工程架构

walterbyrd写道：

有人认为它会。


直到现在，Java从未成为不同版本的标准
Linux和Unix的b $ b。有些人认为这是一些开发人员已经避免使用Java支持Python的原因之一。既然Java已经被GPL'认可了，那么
可能会改变。


IMO：它没有太大的区别。但我真的不知道。

我希望有一个更乐观的结果，这可能会打开一个

的可能性java程序和python之间的互操作性更高

程序。也就是说，在python上运行java类文件或java代码

VM。这还是蓝天梦吗？


maurice

Some think it will.

Up untill now, Java has never been standard across different versions
of Linux and Unix. Some think that is one reason that some developers
have avoided Java in favor of Python. Now that Java has been GPL''d that
might change.

IMO: it won''t make much difference. But I don''t really know.

解决方案

walterbyrd wrote:

Some think it will.

Up untill now, Java has never been standard across different versions
of Linux and Unix. Some think that is one reason that some developers
have avoided Java in favor of Python. Now that Java has been GPL''d that
might change.

IMO: it won''t make much difference. But I don''t really know.

The change might also provide an opportunity for further expansion of
jython, eating into Java "marketshare"

"walterbyrd" <wa********@iname.comwrites:

Some think it will.

Up untill now, Java has never been standard across different versions
of Linux and Unix. Some think that is one reason that some developers
have avoided Java in favor of Python. Now that Java has been GPL''d that
might change.

IMO: it won''t make much difference. But I don''t really know.

Short answer: People use Python instead of Java because people (at
least intelligent people) tend to avoid pain.

Long answer: Changing licenses doesn''t magically change Java''s
architecture. It is still a closed world of reinvent-the-wheel,
my-way-or-the-highway. Which is antithetical to Python''s promiscuous
interface-with-anything approach.

--
Harry George
PLM Engineering Architecture

walterbyrd wrote:

Some think it will.

Up untill now, Java has never been standard across different versions
of Linux and Unix. Some think that is one reason that some developers
have avoided Java in favor of Python. Now that Java has been GPL''d that
might change.

IMO: it won''t make much difference. But I don''t really know.

I''m hoping for a more optimistic outcome that this may open a
possibility for tigher interoperability between java programs and python
programs. That is, run java class files or java codes natively on python
VM. Is this still a blue sky dream?

maurice

这篇关于GPL Java会吞噬Python市场份额吗？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！