哪个IDE更适合C＃，Borland C＃Builder或VS.net 2003？ [英] Which IDE is better for C#, Borland C#Builder or VS.net 2003?

问题描述

我是C＃语言学习者。

我想知道哪个IDE更适合C＃编程，Borland C＃Builder或

VS.net 2003？


-

通过发布消息http://www.dotnetmonster.com

I''m a C# language learner.
I want to know which IDE is better for C# programing, Borland C#Builder or
VS.net 2003?

--
Message posted via http://www.dotnetmonster.com

推荐答案

自然VS;）为了学习，你可以下载C＃Express beta，这是一个

免费产品。 SharpDevelop http://www.icsharpcode.net/opensource/sd/ 免费提供

a相当不错。

-

William Stacey，MVP
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com


" smartwolf agassi通过DotNetMonster.com < FO *** @ DotNetMonster.com>写在

消息新闻：dc ****************************** @ DotNetMonste r.com。 ..

Naturally VS ;) For learning you can download C# Express beta which is a
free product. SharpDevelop http://www.icsharpcode.net/opensource/sd/ makes
a pretty good one also for free.
--
William Stacey, MVP
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com

"smartwolf agassi via DotNetMonster.com" <fo***@DotNetMonster.com> wrote in
message news:dc******************************@DotNetMonste r.com...

我是C＃语言学习者。
我想知道哪个IDE更适合C＃编程，Borland C＃Builder或
VS.net 2003？

-
通过 http://www.dotnetmonster.com发布的消息

I''m a C# language learner.
I want to know which IDE is better for C# programing, Borland C#Builder or
VS.net 2003?

--
Message posted via http://www.dotnetmonster.com

我曾经只是一个Delphi开发人员，因此非常大的Borland

支持者。然而，这一切都随着VS.net 2003而改变。我工作的公司

决定我们要遵守一个.net语言，那就是C＃。

全部开发人员拥有MSDN Universal订阅，因此使用的IDE是

简单选择公司。但是，我从Borland那里得到了一份C＃Builder

Arch。我不再拥有该副本并仅使用VS.net。


没有人真的比另一个更好，至少在我使用的短时间内

都。以下是我放弃Borland工具的两个主要原因：


1）整天在VS.net工作，然后回家并在C＃builder中工作
是一种痛苦，界面完全不同。


2）最重要的是，还没有针对.net 2.0 beta的C＃builder beta，以及
$ b根据我所知道的$ b，不会很快就会有任何时间。


Borland将永远落后于让新Ides出局，并且

将来只会让我和VS.net在一起。我真的很喜欢使用最新的技术玩

而且我非常喜欢2.0中的Generics，因此我在家里的个人开发完全是在2.0版本中完成的。


如果您正在寻找的是IDE，我建议您使用

VS.net。然而，Borland的C＃arch，或者更确切地说是Delphi 2005 arch（支持C＃，

Delphi，我很快就听说过VB的传言）来自Together，还有一些

用于完整软件开发生命周期的其他工具。虽然团队

系统即将推出....


-

谢谢

Wayne Sepega

Jacksonville，Fl

当一个男人和一个漂亮的女孩坐在一起一小时后，似乎只需一分钟。但是

让他坐在热炉上一分钟，它比任何一小时都要长。

那是'相对论'。 - Albert Einstein


" smartwolf agassi via DotNetMonster.com" < FO *** @ DotNetMonster.com>写在

消息新闻：dc ****************************** @ DotNetMonste r.com。 ..

I used to be only a Delphi Developer and as such a very big Borland
supporter. However, that all changed with VS.net 2003. Company I work for
decided that we were going to conform to one .net langue, and that was C#.
All developers have an MSDN Universal subscription so which IDE to use was
simple choose for the company. However, I had gotten a copy of C# Builder
Arch from Borland. I no longer have that copy and use VS.net only.

No one was really better than the other, at least for the short time I used
both. The following are the two main reasons I gave up on Borland''s tool:

1) working in VS.net all day and then going home and working in C# builder
was a pain, interfaces completely different.

2) most important, there is no C# builder beta for .net 2.0 beta yet, and
from what I know there won''t be any time soon.

Borland will always be behind the curve on getting the new Ides'' out, and
that alone will keep me with VS.net in the future. I really like to play
with the newest technology and I really like Generics in 2.0 and as such all
my personal development at home has been completely done in 2.0.

If all you are looking for is an IDE I would suggest that you go with
VS.net. However, Borland''s C# arch, or rather Delphi 2005 arch (supports C#,
Delp and I''ve heard rumors of VB soon) comes with Together, and some
other tools for complete Software Development Life cycle. Though with team
systems coming out soon....

--
Thanks
Wayne Sepega
Jacksonville, Fl
"When a man sits with a pretty girl for an hour, it seems like a minute. But
let him sit on a hot stove for a minute and it''s longer than any hour.
That''s relativity." - Albert Einstein

"smartwolf agassi via DotNetMonster.com" <fo***@DotNetMonster.com> wrote in
message news:dc******************************@DotNetMonste r.com...

我是C＃语言学习者。
我想知道哪个IDE更适合C＃编程，Borland C＃Builder或
VS.net 2003？

-
通过 http://www.dotnetmonster.com发布的消息

I''m a C# language learner.
I want to know which IDE is better for C# programing, Borland C#Builder or
VS.net 2003?

--
Message posted via http://www.dotnetmonster.com

" William Stacey [MVP]" < ST *********** @ mvps.org>写在

新闻：Ov ************** @ TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl：

"William Stacey [MVP]" <st***********@mvps.org> wrote in
news:Ov**************@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl:

自然VS;）为了学习你可以下载C＃Express beta是一个

Naturally VS ;) For learning you can download C# Express beta which is a

说明原因而不仅仅是意见是有帮助的。实际上它似乎主要是用户偏好，而且很多用户喜欢其他用户，而且用户最需要看的是两者。在VS中有一些东西可以让我疯狂，在Borland Dev中好多了

Studio，反之亦然。


Borland C＃Builder虽然已经过时了，但C＃现在是Delphi的个性版本

2005.

-

Chad Z. Hower（又名Kudzu） - http://www.hower.org/Kudzu/

编程是一种反击的艺术形式


在更短的时间内开发ASP.NET应用程序：
http://www.atozed.com/IntraWeb/

这篇关于哪个IDE更适合C＃，Borland C＃Builder或VS.net 2003？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！