Visual C ++或Borland C ++ [英] Visual C++ or Borland C++
问题描述
我刚刚开始编程并需要一些建议。
我有Visual C ++ 6.0标准版和Borland C ++ Builder 6.
这两个你认为最好的编程Windows程序
（不是DOS风格的程序）。我已经快速浏览了这两个和
Borland似乎有更多的组件（按钮，表单等）而不是
Microsoft Visual C ++。 Visual C ++是否容易使用这些组件
可访问。
Chris。
Borland C ++ Builder（BCB）是很棒的工具。
但是经过这些年来，由于一些难以理解的原因，Borland
决定不继续使用BCB产品。
因此，Ver 6似乎是BCB的最后一个版本。 Altough BCB是一个非常好的，非常好的b $ b，它有很大的组件库，所以推荐BCB（或任何Borland产品，因为公司变得不可预测）是不明智的。
，不再值得信赖了）为你的努力工作。
我刚刚开始编程，需要一些建议。
我有两个Visual C ++ 6.0标准版和Borland C ++ Builder 6.
这两个你认为最适合编程windows
程序（不是DOS风格的程序）。我已经快速浏览了这两个并且
Borland似乎比Microsoft Visual C ++有更多的组件（按钮，表单等）。 Visual C ++是否可以轻松访问这些组件。
Chris。
" Chris" < CH ****** @ optusnet.com.au>在留言中写道
news：41 *********************** @ news.optusnet.com.a u ... < blockquote class =post_quotes>我刚刚开始编程并需要一些建议。
我有Visual C ++ 6.0标准版和Borland C ++ Builder 6.
这两个你认为是最适合编程windows
程序（不是DOS风格程序）。我已经快速浏览了这两个并且
Borland似乎比Microsoft Visual C ++有更多的组件（按钮，表单等）。 Visual C ++是否可以轻松访问这些组件。
Chris。
Borland 6的Windows编程学习曲线更容易。
升级你的知识也很容易，因为VCL（Visual
组件库）与.NET的概念非常相似
Visual C ++另一方面，学习曲线会更难，
您选择MFC或Win32并且知识将上厕所
，因为MS正在捣毁这项技术。另一方面，对于某些任务（ActiveX，ATL，MFC等）可能是更好的选择
Chris写道：我刚刚开始编程并需要一些建议。
我有Visual C ++ 6.0标准版和Borland C ++ Builder 6.
这两个你认为最好的用于编程windows
程序（不是DOS风格程序）。我已经快速浏览了这两个并且
Borland似乎比Microsoft Visual C ++有更多的组件（按钮，表单等）。 Visual C ++是否可以轻松访问这些组件。
Chris。
您总是可以尝试在Visual Basic上使用QT C ++，用于
me： ftp://ftp.trolltech.com/qt/non-comme...Commercial.exe
imho，它很容易使用且很好记录，它比mfc更开放
（我个人真的不喜欢......）
玩得开心，
--wim
I am just beginning programming again and need a bit of advice.
I have both Visual C++ 6.0 Standard Edition and Borland C++ Builder 6.
Of these two which do you consider the best for programming windows programs
(not the DOS style program). I have had a quick look at both of these and
Borland seems to have a lot more components (Buttons, Forms etc) than
Microsoft Visual C++. Does Visual C++ have these components easily
accesable.
Chris.
Borland C++ Builder (BCB) is/was fantastic tool.
BUT after all those years, for some difficult to understand reason, Borland
decided not to continue BCB product.
So, Ver 6 seems to the last version of BCB. Altough BCB is a fantastic, very
easy to use and it has huge component library, it would not wise to
recommend BCB (or any Borland product, because company became unpredictable
and not trustworthy anymore) for your forthcomming endeavour.
I am just beginning programming again and need a bit of advice.
I have both Visual C++ 6.0 Standard Edition and Borland C++ Builder 6.
Of these two which do you consider the best for programming windows programs (not the DOS style program). I have had a quick look at both of these and
Borland seems to have a lot more components (Buttons, Forms etc) than
Microsoft Visual C++. Does Visual C++ have these components easily
accesable.
Chris.
"Chris" <ch******@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:41***********************@news.optusnet.com.a u...I am just beginning programming again and need a bit of advice.
I have both Visual C++ 6.0 Standard Edition and Borland C++ Builder 6.
Of these two which do you consider the best for programming windows programs (not the DOS style program). I have had a quick look at both of these and
Borland seems to have a lot more components (Buttons, Forms etc) than
Microsoft Visual C++. Does Visual C++ have these components easily
accesable.
Chris.
Borland 6 has much easier learning curve for Windows programming.
It will be also easy to upgrade your knowledge, because VCL (Visual
Component Library) has very similar concepts as .NET
Visual C++ on the other hand will have much harder learning curve,
either you choose MFC or Win32 and the knowledge will go to toilet
since MS is trashing this technology. On the other hand, it may be
beter choice for certain tasks (ActiveX, ATL, MFC etc.)
Chris wrote:I am just beginning programming again and need a bit of advice.
I have both Visual C++ 6.0 Standard Edition and Borland C++ Builder 6.
Of these two which do you consider the best for programming windows programs (not the DOS style program). I have had a quick look at both of these and
Borland seems to have a lot more components (Buttons, Forms etc) than
Microsoft Visual C++. Does Visual C++ have these components easily
accesable.
Chris.
you can always try to use QT on top of Visual C++, worked for
me:ftp://ftp.trolltech.com/qt/non-comme...Commercial.exe
imho, it''s easy to use and well documented and it''s more open than mfc
(which i personally really dislike...)
Have fun,
--wim
这篇关于Visual C ++或Borland C ++的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
