需要升级 - 2002年或2003年？ [英] Need to upgrade - 2002 or 2003?
问题描述
似乎我在我的
心爱访问97中遇到了一个无法修复且已确认的错误，除了升级之外没有任何解决方法。
当前支持的升级是在2002年和2003年。
2003似乎使用了大量的'o系统资源，所以我想知道我是否
最好与较旧的（2002年）版本。
有什么意见吗？特别是哪个版本更有可能使97个数据库的转换最不痛苦？两次升级
的费用相同......
感谢您的任何想法。
It seems I have run afoul of an unfixable and acknowledged bug in my
beloved access 97 which has no workaround other than to upgrade.
Current supported upgrades are 2002 and 2003.
2003 appears to use lots ''o system resources, so I am wondering if I am
best to go with the older (2002) version.
Any opinions out here? In particular, which version more likely to make
the conversion of the 97 databases the least painful? Both upgrades
cost the same...
Thanks for any thoughts.
推荐答案
Stephan Golux< st ***** @ nospam.com.goluxstudio.invalid>写在
新闻：xd **************** @ newsread2.news.atl.earthli nk.net:
Stephan Golux <st*****@nospam.com.goluxstudio.invalid> wrote in
news:xd****************@newsread2.news.atl.earthli nk.net:
似乎我在我心爱的访问97中遇到了一个无法修复和确认的错误，除了升级之外没有任何解决办法。
或许，你应该告诉我们这个bug。
几乎所有的bug都有解决方法。
当前支持的升级是2002年和2003年。
2003似乎使用很多''o系统资源，所以我想知道我是否最好与旧的（2002）版本一起使用。
这里有什么意见？特别是哪个版本更有可能使97个数据库的转换最不痛苦？这两个升级成本相同......
It seems I have run afoul of an unfixable and acknowledged bug in my
beloved access 97 which has no workaround other than to upgrade.
Perhaps, you should tell us about the bug. There are work-arounds for
almost all bugs.
Current supported upgrades are 2002 and 2003.
2003 appears to use lots ''o system resources, so I am wondering if I am
best to go with the older (2002) version.
Any opinions out here? In particular, which version more likely to make
the conversion of the 97 databases the least painful? Both upgrades
cost the same...
您将来可能会想要一些功能
是在2003年但不是在2002年？
软件很快就会过时。为什么要这样开始？
-
Lyle
（电子邮件参考 http://ffdba.com/contacts.htm ）
Lyle Fairfield写道：
< snip>
Lyle Fairfield wrote:
<snip>
也许，你应该告诉我们这个bug。几乎所有的bug都有解决方法。
我之前已经写过关于这个新闻组中的错误 - 请参阅
主题标题为将报告导出为RTF格式导致意外
截断。我后来发现了一篇微软的知识库文章
描述了这个bug，即文章＃288877。网址：
http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;en-us;288877
< snip>
是您可能希望将来某些功能在2003年可用但在2002年没有？
软件很快就会过时。为什么要这样开始？
Perhaps, you should tell us about the bug. There are work-arounds for
almost all bugs.
I have previously written about the bug in this newsgroup - see the
thread titled "Exporting Reports to RTF format causes unexpected
truncation". I have since found a microsoft knowledgebase article that
describes the bug, namely article #288877. URL:
http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;en-us;288877
<snip>
Is it possible that you will want in the future some feature that is
available in 2003 but not in 2002?
Software becomes obsolete very quickly. Why start out that way?
很可能，但我对功能和资源膨胀也很敏感。
Access 2003（由microsoft'提供已发布的规格）需要两倍于2002年的记忆，所以我部分想知道它是否值得。我已经听说有传言说2003年表现更差。另外，由于我需要
来使用97中创建的一些数据库，我很好奇
是否存在我需要关注的向后兼容性问题
about。
Quite possible, but I am also sensitive to feature and resource bloat.
Access 2003 (by microsoft''s published specifications) requires double
the memory of 2002, so I partly want to know if it is worth it. I have
also heard rumors that performance is worse in 2003. Also, since I need
to use a number of databases that were created in 97, I am curious about
whether there are backward compatibility issues I need to be concerned
about.
" Stephan Golux" < ST ***** @ nospam.com.goluxstudio.invalid>在消息中写道
新闻：X％**************** @ newsread2.news.atl.earthli nk.net ...
"Stephan Golux" <st*****@nospam.com.goluxstudio.invalid> wrote in message
news:X%****************@newsread2.news.atl.earthli nk.net...
Lyle Fairfield写道：
< snip>
Lyle Fairfield wrote:
<snip>
也许，你应该告诉我们这个bug。几乎所有的bug都有解决方法。
Perhaps, you should tell us about the bug. There are work-arounds for
almost all bugs.
我之前已经写过关于这个新闻组中的错误 - 请参阅标题为将报告导出到的
主题RTF格式导致意外的截断。我后来发现了一篇描述该bug的微软知识库文章，即文章＃288877。网址：
I have previously written about the bug in this newsgroup - see the
thread titled "Exporting Reports to RTF format causes unexpected
truncation". I have since found a microsoft knowledgebase article that
describes the bug, namely article #288877. URL:
我在继续之前要做的第一件事是找到一个更新的
版本的人来绝对确认RTF问题已经解决在那些
版本中。我不太确定它们是不是。
-
我没有查看电子邮件帐户附上
到此消息。发送给...
在Hunter dot com的RBrandt
The first thing I would do before proceeding is finding someone with a newer
version to absolutely confirm that the RTF problems are solved in those
versions. I am not so sure that they are.
--
I don''t check the Email account attached
to this message. Send instead to...
RBrandt at Hunter dot com
这篇关于需要升级 - 2002年或2003年？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
