升级到Access 2002或2003？ [英] upgrade to Access 2002 or 2003?
问题描述
我已经在Access 97中构建了我的所有应用程序，但我认为现在是时候将一些更新的技术移动到某个新技术（对于网络应用程序游戏来说有点晚了......） ）所以我是
考虑升级。有什么理由不直接到2003年和
跳过2000/2002？ Access 2003会为仍然运行Win98 / 2000的客户创建问题吗？我还需要考虑什么？
任何指导都会有所帮助
谢谢 -
jeff
最近有一些话题说你无法无缝打开2003 db（包含
VBA），除非你提供一个数字证书！
一个人不会在2003年的50英里内，直到我知道更多关于
*那个*一个。 br />
HTH，
TC
" Jeff Keller" < JK ******** @ aol.com>在消息中写道
news：c5 ************************** @ posting.google.c om ...我已经在Access 97中构建了我的所有应用程序，但我认为现在是时候将其移动到一些新技术（对于Web应用程序游戏来说有点晚了...... 。）所以我在考虑升级。有什么理由不直接到2003年和
跳过2000/2002？ Access 2003是否会为仍在运行Win98 / 2000的客户创建问题？我还需要考虑什么呢？
任何指导都会有所帮助
感谢 -
杰夫
" TC"写了
最近有一些话题说明你无法无缝打开2003 db（包含
VBA），除非你提供了
数字证书！
您可以将宏安全性（新）设置为低。而且你不会比自从Access 1.0以来更不安全
。或者你可以使用自我。认证
您自己的数据库，如果您不在业务中并且需要使用
公共证书进行认证。
并且，如果它没有签名并且你没有将宏安全性设置为低，所有
它会给你一个消息框告诉你，如果它有VBA它可以做到
损坏。
一个人不会在2003年的50英里内进行，直到我知道更多关于*那个*一个。
但是，如果您不需要在公司设置和/或改进的XML中改进协作功能，那么改变的原因就没那么令人信服了。来自Access 2002的
。对于个人用户有一些适度的改进
和小型组织，但没有什么惊天动地。
Larry Linson
Microsoft Access MVP
" Jeff Keller" < JK ******** @ aol.com>在消息中写道
news：c5 ************************** @ posting.google.c om ...我已经在Access 97中构建了我的所有应用程序，但我认为现在是时候将其移动到一些新技术（对于Web应用程序游戏来说有点晚了...... 。）所以我在考虑升级。有什么理由不直接到2003年和
跳过2000/2002？ Access 2003是否会为仍在运行Win98 / 2000的客户创建问题？我还需要考虑什么呢？
任何指导都会有所帮助
谢谢 -
杰夫
根据Larry Linson的说法，你应该坚持使用Access 97.
Access 2K系列没有一个正常工作。
Paul
I''ve built all of my apps in Access 97, but I think it''s time I moved
to some newer technology (a little late to the web app game...) so I''m
considering an upgrade. Any reason not to go straight to 2003 and
skip 2000/2002? Will Access 2003 create issues for clients that are
still running Win98/2000? What else do I need to consider?
Any guidance would be helpful
thanks-
jeff
There''s been some talk recently that you can not open a 2003 db (containing
VBA) seamlessly, unless you provide a digital certificate!
I for one will not be going within 50 miles of 2003, until I know more about
*that* one.
HTH,
TC
"Jeff Keller" <jk********@aol.com> wrote in message
news:c5**************************@posting.google.c om...I''ve built all of my apps in Access 97, but I think it''s time I moved
to some newer technology (a little late to the web app game...) so I''m
considering an upgrade. Any reason not to go straight to 2003 and
skip 2000/2002? Will Access 2003 create issues for clients that are
still running Win98/2000? What else do I need to consider?
Any guidance would be helpful
thanks-
jeff
"TC" wrote
There''s been some talk recently that
you can not open a 2003 db (containing
VBA) seamlessly, unless you provide a
digital certificate!
You can set macro security (new) to "Low" and you won''t be any less secure
than you have been since Access 1.0. Or you can use a "selfcert" to certify
your own databases, if you aren''t in the business and need to certify with a
public certificate.
And, if it isn''t "signed" and you haven''t set macro security to "Low", all
it does is give you a message box telling you that if it has VBA it could do
damage.
I for one will not be going within
50 miles of 2003, until I know more
about *that* one.
But, if you don''t need improved collaboration features in a corporate
setting and/or improved XML, then there''s little compelling reason to change
from Access 2002. There are some modest improvements for the individual user
and small organization, but nothing earthshaking.
Larry Linson
Microsoft Access MVP
"Jeff Keller" <jk********@aol.com> wrote in message
news:c5**************************@posting.google.c om...I''ve built all of my apps in Access 97, but I think it''s time I moved
to some newer technology (a little late to the web app game...) so I''m
considering an upgrade. Any reason not to go straight to 2003 and
skip 2000/2002? Will Access 2003 create issues for clients that are
still running Win98/2000? What else do I need to consider?
Any guidance would be helpful
thanks-
jeff
According to Larry Linson, you should stick with Access 97. None of the
Access 2K series works properly.
Paul
这篇关于升级到Access 2002或2003？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
