我讨厌这个网站，我的大学同学建议我，但它让我疯了......我 [英] I hate this website, my university fellows suggest me, but it has made me crazy..I

问题描述

我发了4篇文章，每次我扩展它并使其更清晰但委员会一次又一次地拒绝它，有些人在评论中说得更清楚所以扩展但我不能扩展它比这更多所以他说我写了一个提示/技巧，所以它做到了但委员会再次拒绝。

它踢我这么辛苦：@

http://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/ArticleVersion。 aspx？aid = 866344& av = 1290776& msg = 4981713＃xx4981713xx [ ^ ]

I posted an article 4 times and every time i am expanding it and making it more clear but the committee is rejecting it again and again, some people in comments said make it more clear so expand but i cannot expand it more than this so he said me to write a tip/trick for that, so it did it but again the committee reject.
Its kicking me so hard :@
http://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/ArticleVersion.aspx?aid=866344&av=1290776&msg=4981713#xx4981713xx[^]

推荐答案

这是错误的地方带来这个，有一个文章撰写论坛，您可以获得支持和帮助： http://www.codeproject.com/Forums/1641/Article-Writing.aspx [ ^ ]



但是，既然你有......

这是我第一次看到你的文章，我必须同意与你交谈的人（他们的评论因文章已经关闭而不可见） - 这不是一篇文章。它可能是一个提示，但作为一个完整的文章，它相当薄，缺乏任何细节。

你有少量的代码（双倍间距，使它看起来更大）真的没有告诉你很多。

你有更少量的单词基本上介绍了下载，但没有解释它是如何工作的，为什么存在，或者为什么我可能想要使用它。 />


为我尝试一下：查看文章，并使用每个代码块上的折叠功能来隐藏它。看看你剩下的东西。不是很多，是吗？



问题在于，一篇文章应该是所有关于单词的 - 如果你愿意的话研究文档 - 包含图像和代码片段添加以使文本更易读和更容易理解。你的不是，现在还没有 - 所有下载都是关于如何使用它的一个小解释。我相信你已经在代码中加入了一些工作并使其正确，但你需要解释它是如何工作的，原因是什么，以及它如何比替代方案更好。目前，这不是那样做 - 它只是提供代码。



事实上，所有文章都经过审核 - 并且由撰写文章的人，这就是获得特权的唯一方法。这意味着我们知道写单词是多么困难 - 比编写代码背后的代码要困难得多！但是......缓和的工作的一部分是保持高标准的文章 - 这毕竟是为什么人们来到这里，以及为什么人们在这里写文章。如果我们通过低劣的质量，当你收到评论时会更讨厌它，并且表示它不是很好 - 它几乎可以肯定会是这样的。



我也不会让它通过它的当前形式，那里只有一篇文章。我同意那里可能会有一个提示，但即便如此，它还需要对文字进行投资，并删除大部分代码，这几乎无关紧要。不要把这当作委员会的一颗牙齿，这根本不是那样。拒绝事情的版主通常会给出评论，这些评论可以帮助您达到可发布的标准 - 尝试查看他们所说的内容并阅读文章，就像您是随机成员而不是作者一样。您是否希望将您宝贵的时间用于尝试使用它，或者您是否会继续展示更多我可以用它做什么的东西，并且这是一个有助于我解决问题的优质项目？我不得不说，在那篇文章的基础上，我会一直向前看，看看下一位候选人（如果我通过搜索与我相关的条款找到你的候选人）。



苛刻？也许。但是试着想要改变一个下注者，你可能会看到不同的文章。

This is the wrong place to bring this, there is a forum for article writing where you can get support and help: http://www.codeproject.com/Forums/1641/Article-Writing.aspx[^]

But, since you have...
This is the first time I've seen your article, and I have to agree with whoever has been speaking to you (their comments aren't visible because the article is closed) - that isn't an article. It could be a tip, but as a full blown article it is rather thin, and lacking in any details.
You have a small amount of code (double spaced to make it look bigger) that really doesn;t tell you much about it.
You have an even smaller amount of words which basically introduce the download without explaining how it works, why it exists, or why I might want to use it.

Try something for me: have a look at the article, and use the "Collapse" feature on each code block to "hide" it. Look at what you have left. Not a lot, is it?

The problem is that an article is supposed to be all about the words - a research document if you like - with images and code fragments added to make the text more readable and easier to understand. Yours isn't, not yet - it's all download with a small explanation of how to use it. I am sure you have put some work into the code and getting it right, but you need to explain how it works, why it is how it is, and how it is better than the alternatives. At the moment, this doesn't do that - it just presents the code.

In truth, all articles are moderated - and by people who write articles, that's the only way to get the privilege. And that means that we know how difficult it is to write the words - a heck of a lot harder than writing the code behind them! But...part of the "job" of moderating is to maintain the high standard of articles - which is after all why people come here, and why people write articles for here. If we let through poor quality, you would hate it even more when it gets comments and downvotes indicating it isn't very good - which it almost certainly would.

I would not let this through in it's current form either, there just isn't an article there. I'd agree there could be a tip there, but even then it needs investment in words, and the removal of most of the code, which is pretty much irrelevant. Don't take this as a kick in the teeth by the committee, it isn't that way at all. Moderators who reject things often give comments which can help you get this up to a publishable standard - try looking at what they said and reading the article as if you were a random member rather than the author. Would you want to invest your precious time in trying to use this, or would you move on to something that shows more of what I can do with it, and that it's a quality project that will help me past a problem? I have to say that on the basis of that article, I'd move right along and look at the next candidate (if I even found yours by searching for terms relevant to me).

Harsh? Maybe. But try thinking like a punter for a change and you might see the article differently.

我不知道为什么你的文章在审核期间被拒绝了，但我可能会根据它进行投票关于其内容中的一些问题。我只是不想下载并查看你的代码，所以我的笔记将只是我在主文章页面上看到的内容。



First of总之，你的想法非常有趣，但非常有名。你的第一个问题是错误的术语和标题。你建模的不是分数。它有一个完善的名称和数学概念：有理数：

http ：//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rational_number [ ^ ]。



请注意并非所有小数都是合理的。实际上，很容易证明有理数的集合具有相同的基数（无限，请参阅 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cardinal_number [ ^ ]）作为集合或整数。这是中级微积分课程中非常常见的练习。当然，你应该清楚地知道，所有计算机格式中表示的所有数字总是有限集（只是因为计算机本身的所有状态都只有有限集;请参阅：http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finite-state_machine [ ^ ]）。



因此，有理数对象应表示为一对整数。这应该是它的内部表示，没有别的。构造函数接受并将字符串解析为有理数字对象可能很好，但几乎无关紧要。这样说：使用它会是一种滥用，而不是真正需要的。所有功能都应该在算术中，这里你的文章缺乏重要的东西。 （我说的是你的文章，而不是代码。如果这是在你的代码中，你应该在文章中解释它，否则 - 为什么写它？）



首先，你没有描述最重要的事情：减少分数，找到共同点并除以它。也许你在构造函数中执行它，也许你在运算符中执行它。你应该这样做。但您还需要对其进行描述，因为这是代码功能的一部分。您需要展示它的设计和实现方式，并解释它的所有数学方面。

您需要考虑这里提到的所有功能： https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fraction_%28mathematics%29 [ ^ ]。



现在，您正在使用C ++。你如何实现运营商？我没有看到运算符重载的描述。这是一个编程论坛。为了正确的编程文化，您需要利用运算符重载并向经验不足的开发人员解释它的用途。请参阅：

http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language /运营商 [ ^ ]。



因此，再次假设您在可下载代码中包含完整实现。我只是没有兴趣下载并查看它，因为你的文章已经不满意了。以下是您的操作：您只描述了类库的用法，功能有限，没有演示结果，特殊情况等。您是否了解它的外观？它看起来像广告。 广告风格只会让读者感到恼火。人们希望看到你做得体面，并提供真正开源的，明确，整洁，可维护的实施，下载代码之前。否则，为什么要烦心？



最后，请记住仇恨与任何创造性工作相反。我能理解你的挫败感，但在这里你与人沟通。是的，生活常常暗示仇恨的一个或另一个原因。但是，最好是缓慢的仇恨，快速的合作。首先，尝试与人交谈，然后才决定你是否喜欢某事。例如，如果是我的帖子，我只是建议您改进方法。我建议你使用它们。

-SA

I have no idea why your article was rejected during moderation, but I would likely down-vote it based just on some problems in its content. I just don't want to download and look at your code, so my notes will be just on the content I can see on the main article page.

First of all, your idea is pretty interesting but quite well-known. Your first problem is wrong terminology and the title. What you model is not "fraction numbers". It has a well-establish name and mathematical concept: rational numbers:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rational_number[^].

Note that not all fractional numbers are rational. Actually, it's a really easy to proof that the set of rational numbers has the same cardinal number (infinite, please see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cardinal_number[^]) as the set or integer numbers. It is a very usual exercise in the middle-level calculus course. Of course, you should clearly understand that all numbers represented in all computer formats always make a finite set (just because all the states of the computer itself make only the finite set; please see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finite-state_machine[^]).

So, the rational number object should be represented as a pair of integers. This should be its internal representation, nothing else. You constructor accepting and parsing the string into a rational number object is maybe nice, but is pretty much irrelevant. Put it this way: using it would be a kind of abuse and not really needed. All functionality should be in its arithmetic, and here your article lacks important things. (I am talking of your article, not code. If this is in your code, you should explain it in the article, otherwise — why writing it?)

First of all, you did not describe most important thing: reduction of the fraction, finding common denominator and dividing by it. Maybe you do it in your constructor, maybe you do it in your operators. You should do it. But you also need to describe it, because this is the part of code functionality. You need to show how this is designed and implemented, and explain all mathematical aspects of it.
You need to consider all the features mentioned here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fraction_%28mathematics%29[^].

Now, you are using C++. How do you implement operators? I don't see the description of your operator overloading. This is a programming forum. For proper programming culture, you need to utilize "operator overloading" and explain its use to less experienced developers. Please see:
http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/operators[^].

So, again, let's assume that you include full implementation in your downloadable code. I'm just not interested to download it and look at it, because your article is already unsatisfactory. Here is what you do: you describe only the usage of your class library, with limited features, without demonstrating the results, special cases, etc. Do you understand how it looks? It looks like advertizement. Advertizement style just irritates the readers. People want to see that you are doing decent thing and provide really open source with well-defined, neat and maintainable implementation right away, before downloading code. Otherwise, why bothering?

Finally, remember that hatred is something opposite to any creative work. I can understand your frustration, but here you communicate with people. Yes, life often suggests one or another reason for hatred. But it's always better to be slow in hatred, quick on collaboration. First, try to talk to people, and only later decide if you like something or not. In case of my post, for example, I just try to suggest you the ways for improvement. I advise you to use them.

—SA

这篇关于我讨厌这个网站，我的大学同学建议我，但它让我疯了......我的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！