投资组合分析问题和关注点 [英] Portfolio Analysis Question and Concern
问题描述
您好，
我进行了投资组合分析，并选择了10个项目中的一个。我进入了需求详细信息报告，它表明我需要开发人员，所以我进入了资源并激活了一系列我已经准备好的开发人员并刷新了分析
和reran，并选择了更多项目。然后我进入了需求详细信息报告，它告诉我我需要测试分析师，所以我选择雇用2个资源，它表明需要的数量，并重新计算。然后它选择了几个项目和
然后需求详细报告表明我需要几个PM。因此，我选择添加更多资源并重新计算，并选择所有项目。然后，我进入了新员工报告，它告诉我需要聘请建筑师，开发人员，PM，测试
分析师和业务分析师！为什么它没有告诉我在第一个要求详细信息报告中我需要填写所有角色，它一次一个地给我一个？这个不好。
我的问题是，当它试图为一个项目配备可用资源时，如果项目管理员可用于一个为期两年的项目，可能只有几个月的差距，那么用另外一个或两个PM来填写那两个月可能有这几个月的可用性？
我想这在统计上和逻辑上是正确的，但它有点暗示资源是小部件，可以移动而没有任何问题。最有可能的是，任何组织都会关注这个PM没有可用性的2个月，如果可能的话，可以调整那些
。当然，如果是休假时间，则需要填写。我知道构建这种类型的人工智能还有很长的路要走，如果可能的话，我只想验证我的假设，这样我就可以为高级管理层描绘工具的实际情况。任何和所有的帮助和评论将不胜感激。
真诚的，Ray Wohltman
是的 - 这是我的经验。如果你有10个团队成员，每个团队每周有1个小时的剩余容量......并且每个团队每周需要10个小时，那么它将被选中"in"。
实际上，这可能没问题......与资源经理一起工作总是有可能高估其他一些工作，或者有些工作可以从1或2资源开辟更长时间的10小时。
关于休假时间 - 我们肯定会在企业日历中输入假期和关闭。我认为这些都反映在投资组合分析中。我们还发现，在病假，假期，移民，丧亲之痛，陪审义务等方面......我们应该只计算满$ 85的b $ b％，这就是"最大单位"。对于我们的大多数资源。做那样的事情*会让你更接近，但截至目前看起来并不像"投资组合分析"。正在考虑资源上的最大单位
Hello,
I've run a portfolio analysis, and it selected one of 10 projects. I went into the Requirements Details report and it indicated that I needed developers, so I went into Resources and activated a series of developers I had ready and refreshed the analysis and reran, and selected more projects. I then went into the Requirements Details report and it told me that I needed Test Analysts, so I choose to hire 2 resources, the amount it indicated it needed, and recalculated. It then selected a few more projects and then the Requirements Detail report indicated I needed a few PM's. So, I choose to add more resources and recalculated and it selected all the projects. I then went into the New Hire Report and it told me it needed to hire Architects, Developers, PM's, Test Analysts and Business Analysts!! Why did it not tell me in the first Requirements Details report that I needed all of the roles to be filled, it fed them to me one at a time? This is not good.
My question is that when it tried to staff a project with available resources, if a PM is available for a 2 year project, with maybe a few monthly gaps, will it fill in those 2 months with another PM, or 2, that might have availability for those months? I guess this is statistically and logically correct, but it kind of implies resources are widgets and can be moved around without any issue. Most likely any organization would look at the 2 months that this PM didn't have availability, and adjust those if the could. Granted, if it was vacation time a fill in would be needed. I understand building this type of artificial intelligence is a long way off, if even possible, but I'd just like to validate my assumptions so I can paint a realistic picture of the workings of the tool to senior management. Any and all assistance and comments would be greatly appreciated.
Sincerely, Ray Wohltman
Yup - that's my experience. If you have 10 team members, and each has 1 hour a week of remaining capacity... and a new project that would take 10 hours a week from that team, it would get selected "in".
In reality, this might be ok... working with resource managers there's always the possibility that some other work was overestimated, or that some work can move around opening up a bigger block of 10 hours from 1 or 2 resources.
Regarding vacation time - we definitely enter holidays and closures into the enterprise calendar. I think those are reflected within portfolio analysis. We also found that with sick, vacation, fmla, bereavement, jury duty, etc... we should only count on 85% of full capacity - so that's the "max units" for most of our resources. Doing something like that *would* get you closer, but as of now it doesn't seem like "Portfolio Analysis" is taking into consideration max units on resources
这篇关于投资组合分析问题和关注点的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
